2016
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2015.2424894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph Matching: Relax at Your Own Risk

Abstract: Graph matching—aligning a pair of graphs to minimize their edge disagreements—has received wide-spread attention from both theoretical and applied communities over the past several decades, including combinatorics, computer vision, and connectomics. Its attention can be partially attributed to its computational difficulty. Although many heuristics have previously been proposed in the literature to approximately solve graph matching, very few have any theoretical support for their performance. A common techniqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
124
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1; see ref. 27 for a formal proof of failure of convex relaxation on a particular class of random graphs. However, in what follows, we show that by providing additional information in the form of corresponding seeds or vertex attributes disambiguating the symmetry, equivalence of the relaxation to the exact GM problem still holds.…”
Section: Matching Of Symmetric Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1; see ref. 27 for a formal proof of failure of convex relaxation on a particular class of random graphs. However, in what follows, we show that by providing additional information in the form of corresponding seeds or vertex attributes disambiguating the symmetry, equivalence of the relaxation to the exact GM problem still holds.…”
Section: Matching Of Symmetric Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of extensions and open questions that arose during the course of this work. Natural theoretic extensions include lifting Theorems 1 and 2 to non-edge independent models (note that certain localized dependencies amongst edges can easily be handled in the McDiarmind proof framework, while globally dependent errors provide a more significant challenge); formulating the analogues of Theorems 1 and 2 in the weighted, attributed graph settings; and considering the theoretic properties of various continuous relaxations of the multiplex GM problem akin to [1,25,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recent work [30,24] on solving general QAP problems suggests that convex relaxations do not always outperform indefinite relaxations. To this direction, Lim and Wright [22] present a new framework for approximating general QAP problems formulated in terms of sorting networks, and use a continuation procedure [26,23], where they start solving a convex relaxation of the problem and then gradually convert it to a concave one, yielding a local optimum to the original discrete problem.…”
Section: Relation To Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For small-scale problems, exact solutions such as branch-and-bound can be applied [5]. Besides generic approximation algorithms, such as simulated annealing, there has been recent interest in relaxation-based approaches for solving QAPs in the context of graph matching [30,24]. This is particularly alluring for the 2-SUM case as it corresponds to the minimization of a convex objective function, and recent works [8,21] have shown how the relaxed 2-SUM problem can be exactly solved using interior-point methods, in either a matrix or vector-based formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%