Graph theoretical analysis indicates cognitive impairment in MS stems from neural disconnection

Abstract

BackgroundThe mechanisms underlying cognitive impairment in MS are still poorly understood. However, due to the specific pathology of MS, one can expect alterations in connectivity leading to physical and cognitive impairment.AimIn this study we aimed at assessing connectivity differences in EEG between cognitively impaired (CI) and cognitively preserved (CP) MS patients. We also investigated the influence of the measures used to construct networks.MethodsWe included 308 MS patients and divided them into two groups based on their cognitive score. Graph theoretical network analyses were conducted based on networks constructed using different connectivity measures, i.e. correlation, correlation in the frequency domain, coherence, partial correlation, the phase lag index and the imaginary part of coherency. The most commonly encountered network parameters were calculated and compared between the two groups using Wilcoxon's rank test. Clustering coefficients and path lengths were normalized to a randomized mean clustering coefficient and path length for each patient. False discovery rate was used to correct for the multiple comparisons and Cohen's d effect sizes are reported.ResultsCoherence analysis suggests that theta and delta connectivity is significantly smaller in cognitively impaired patients. Small-worldness differences are found in networks based on correlation, theta and delta coherence and correlation in the frequency domain. Modularity was related to age but not to cognition.ConclusionCognitive deterioration in MS is a symptom that seems to be caused by neural disconnections, probably the white matter tracts connecting both hemispheres, and leads to a wide range in network differences which can be assessed by applying GTA to EEG data. In the future, these results may lead to cheaper and more objective assessments of cognitive impairment in MS.

Pifithrin-μ Prevents Cisplatin-Induced Chemobrain by Preserving Neuronal Mitochondrial Function

“…Moreover, we recently showed that cisplatin reduces arborization and spine density of pyramidal neurons in the cingulum [2]. Van Schependom et al described that neural disconnections, especially of white-matter tracts connecting both hemispheres seen in cognitively impaired versus cognitively preserved patients with multiple sclerosis, were responsible for the cognitive impairment observed in these patients [41]. Diffusion tensor neuroimaging of the brains of lung cancer patients indicates that cisplatin treatment results in an increased fractional anisotropy in areas of white matter in the cingulate cortex.…”

Opportunities and methodological challenges in EEG and MEG resting state functional brain network research

“…These studies have provided valuable information on the deviant organisation in the diseased brain, such as in Alzheimer's disease (Stam et al , 2007a, Dubovik et al , 2013, epilepsy (Bartolomei et al , 2006, Ibrahim et al , 2013, schizophrenia (Hinkley et al , 2010, Siebenhuhner et al , 2013, multiple sclerosis (Schoonheim et al , 2013, Van Schependom et al , 2014, Parkinson's disease (Fogelson et al , 2013), as well as in the healthy brain on topics as aging (Smit et al , 2012, Vecchio et al , 2014, gender differences (Boersma et al , 2011) and a healthy lifestyle (Douw et al , 2014). Furthermore, connectivity and functional brain network studies can be used in the clinical setting.…”

Single MRI‐Based Volumetric Assessment in Clinical Practice Is Associated With MS‐Related Disability

“…Cognitive impairment in MS may have different MRI correlates, including WM lesions, damage to the normal‐appearing WM and GM. The strong correlation of cognitive deterioration with cortical pathology does not exclude WM involvement to be predictive of deficits in single domains in the early stages, an observation in line with the hypothesis that an underlying disconnection syndrome due to the involvement of WM tracts might trigger cognitive symptoms . The heterogeneity in assessments, cognitive domains, and follow‐up periods may explain some of the discrepancies in the literature.…”