2018 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/hpec.2018.8547527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GraphChallenge.org: Raising the Bar on Graph Analytic Performance

Abstract: The rise of graph analytic systems has created a need for new ways to measure and compare the capabilities of graph processing systems. The MIT/Amazon/IEEE Graph Challenge has been developed to provide a well-defined community venue for stimulating research and highlighting innovations in graph analysis software, hardware, algorithms, and systems. GraphChallenge.org provides a wide range of preparsed graph data sets, graph generators, mathematically defined graph algorithms, example serial implementations in a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two relevant results on truss decomposition are from the IEEE MIT HPEC GraphChallenge 2018 [27]: the champion [25] is based on a high-performance distributed algorithm (hereafter called PS18) and one of the finalists [22] is based on a high-performance collaborative (GPU+CPU) algorithm (hereafter called MD+18). Another relevant result is a winner of the Student Innovation Awards in the GraphChallenge of the following year [2], which also presents a GPU-based approach for truss decomposition and computing the max truss (hereafter called AA+19).…”
Section: B Indirect Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two relevant results on truss decomposition are from the IEEE MIT HPEC GraphChallenge 2018 [27]: the champion [25] is based on a high-performance distributed algorithm (hereafter called PS18) and one of the finalists [22] is based on a high-performance collaborative (GPU+CPU) algorithm (hereafter called MD+18). Another relevant result is a winner of the Student Innovation Awards in the GraphChallenge of the following year [2], which also presents a GPU-based approach for truss decomposition and computing the max truss (hereafter called AA+19).…”
Section: B Indirect Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network motif enumeration in community detection is to identify and count a given subgraph (related to subgraph isomorphism problem in computer science). This paper studies its special case when the subgraph is particularly a triangle [14]. Other subgraphs such as clique can also be counted by MEGA with different verification schemes.…”
Section: Preliminaries Of Network Motif Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare MEGA with the algorithm in [39], which is an award-winning work of the MIT/Amazon/IEEE Graph Challenge [14]. The algorithm in [39] assigns direction to each edge based on the degree of each vertex.…”
Section: Evaluation On Real-world Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from the algorithms proposed in the IEEE HPEC static graph challenge using high performance CPU or GPU to boost performance [50], our focus is to investigate if it is viable to efficiently and economically compute the k-trusses of large networks on a single consumer-grade machine. Therefore, the memory usage by the program is our major concern.…”
Section: Truss Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%