2013
DOI: 10.1021/nl4016683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene-Based Three-Dimensional Hierarchical Sandwich-type Architecture for High-Performance Li/S Batteries

Abstract: A multiwalled carbon nanotube/sulfur (MWCNT@S) composite with core-shell structure was successfully embedded into the interlay galleries of graphene sheets (GS) through a facile two-step assembly process. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy images reveal a 3D hierarchical sandwich-type architecture of the composite GS-MWCNT@S. The thickness of the S layer on the MWCNTs is ~20 nm. Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis confirm that the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
294
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 394 publications
(301 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
294
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, RGO or G does not have the abundant functional groups that can bind sulfur and its discharge products. In addition, similar with previous reports about porous‐carbon/S composites,12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 the sulfur content in the GO/S and RGO/S (or G/S) composites and sulfur loading on the electrode is still low 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44. In addition, some efforts34 have been made to mix high conductivity carbon nanotube (CNT) with GO to improve the conductivity of GO.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, RGO or G does not have the abundant functional groups that can bind sulfur and its discharge products. In addition, similar with previous reports about porous‐carbon/S composites,12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 the sulfur content in the GO/S and RGO/S (or G/S) composites and sulfur loading on the electrode is still low 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44. In addition, some efforts34 have been made to mix high conductivity carbon nanotube (CNT) with GO to improve the conductivity of GO.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, one of the most salient problems of GO also arises from the functional groups on the surface that lead to poor electronic conductivity 46. Therefore, the achieved rate performances in most previous reports about GO/S composites are generally below the rate of 2 C (1 C = 1675 mA g −1 ) 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35. On the contrary, reduced GO (RGO) or graphene (G) with higher electronic conductivity was also employed to prepare RGO/S or G/S composites for improving rate performance 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations