2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene-enhanced microwave absorption properties of Fe3O4/SiO2 nanorods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the existing magnetic materials hardly have magnetic response to the high frequency band between 8.2 and 12.4 GHz [16,17]. In comparison, dielectric loss absorbents (e.g., carbon nanotube (CNT) [18], graphene [19], amorphous carbon [20], ZnO [21], BaTiO 3 [22], and TiO 2 [23], etc) have the advantages of low density, high thermal stability, and high dielectric constant value [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the existing magnetic materials hardly have magnetic response to the high frequency band between 8.2 and 12.4 GHz [16,17]. In comparison, dielectric loss absorbents (e.g., carbon nanotube (CNT) [18], graphene [19], amorphous carbon [20], ZnO [21], BaTiO 3 [22], and TiO 2 [23], etc) have the advantages of low density, high thermal stability, and high dielectric constant value [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the f r of the Co/C composites appeared at gigahertz frequency, which was much higher than that of bulk Co metal. The considerable shift of f r to high frequency could be ascribed to the enhancement of anisotropy field H a ( f r µ H a ) due to the small size effect and confinement effect of the Co NPs embedded in porous carbon . In addition, we analyzed the plot of C 0 ( C 0 = µ ″( µ ′) −2 f −1 ) versus frequency (shown in Figure b) to study the effect of eddy current on magnetic loss.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there was some exchange resonance loss. To study the loss of magnetic absorption materials, the following formula is generally used [19] ′′ (μ ′ ) −2 −1 = 2 3 μ 0 2…”
Section: Effect Of Ball-milling Time On the Absorption Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%