2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene nanosheets generated from sulfonated polystyrene/graphene nanocomposite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The particles of GO are arranged parallel to the substrate and do not form a multilayer assemblies, which typical for graphene due to π − π-stacking [23]. This fact explains the little thickness of the composite at which conductivity is observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…1). The particles of GO are arranged parallel to the substrate and do not form a multilayer assemblies, which typical for graphene due to π − π-stacking [23]. This fact explains the little thickness of the composite at which conductivity is observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…As opposed to unoxidized graphene G1, semioxidized graphene G2 contains surface functional groups (carbonyl, hydroxy, epoxy groups) [10]. In this connection, semioxidized graphene G2, apart from π-π interaction with PANI as similarly to graphene G1, can form hydrogen bonds with sulfogroups of PAMPSA [8] due to its functional groups. The latter hinders aggregation of G2 into stacks and leads to a more uniform distribution of graphene in the nanocomposite, thus considerably expanding the network of charge transport paths in a nanocomposite film, which ultimately results in an increase in the mobility of charge carriers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Unoxidized graphene G1 can manifest π-π interaction between its basal plane and PANI back bone [6], and thus graphene G1 can form chargetransport paths between PANI chains. On the other hand, the tendency toward π-π interaction results in the fact that graphene G1 will more likely aggregate in the form of stacks [8] and not be distributed in the nanocomposite film in the form of separate nanopar ticles. In this case, the concentration of new charge transport paths increases slightly, which explains a negligible increase in conductivity of the PANI/G1 nanocomposite as compared to PANI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When compared to the electrical conductivity of MCC-BMCl, an increment of 46% was determined. An important reason for this improvement in electrical conductivity values may be attributed to combinations of highly conductive graphene in the MCC-BMCl [28,38]. Jung et al investigated the electrical conductivity of electro-active actuators based on graphene reinforced Nafion composite electrolytes.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%