2016
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201600111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene on clean (0001) α-quartz: Numerical determination of a minimum energy path from metal to semiconductor

Abstract: By means of DFT calculations, we have individuated a minimum-energy path connecting two energy minima of clean graphene on clean and relaxed oxygen-terminated (0001)’SiOinline image substrate in the inline image-quartz configuration: one characterized by mutual graphene–SiOinline image substrate distance of inline image2.8 Å and weak (van der Waals) bonds between them, the other by mutual distance of inline image1.4 Å, and presence of strong covalent C–O bonds. Our calculations show that the pathway connecting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors conclude that strong covalent bonds between the C atoms and the substrate atoms are formed (chemisorption), and, as a consequence, the Dirac cone structure is lost. Finally, both covalent bonding and physisorption of graphene on SiO 2 are suggested in other works . To shed some additional light on the binding mechanism, we carried out DFT‐based simulations of adsorption of graphene on SiO 2 with two main goals: first, to clarify whether or not it is possible to induce the formation of covalent bonds between the graphene atoms and the SiO 2 atoms by applying ultrahigh pressure; and second, to estimate a minimum number of covalent bonds needed to maintain the graphene flake strongly coupled to the surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors conclude that strong covalent bonds between the C atoms and the substrate atoms are formed (chemisorption), and, as a consequence, the Dirac cone structure is lost. Finally, both covalent bonding and physisorption of graphene on SiO 2 are suggested in other works . To shed some additional light on the binding mechanism, we carried out DFT‐based simulations of adsorption of graphene on SiO 2 with two main goals: first, to clarify whether or not it is possible to induce the formation of covalent bonds between the graphene atoms and the SiO 2 atoms by applying ultrahigh pressure; and second, to estimate a minimum number of covalent bonds needed to maintain the graphene flake strongly coupled to the surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slab surface is terminated by Si atoms to avoid covalent C−O chemical bonding that may occur in the case of oxygen-terminated quartz, which can substantially distort the planar structure of graphene and lead to the disappearance of the Dirac point degeneracy of graphene. 28,29 The Si dangling bonds in the Si-terminated surface, on the other hand, are chemically passive and preserve the linear graphene band structure near the Fermi level, as well as the Dirac point degeneracy. The adsorption energies per carbon atom in the system are evaluated at −39.8 and −22.5 meV for MLG and BLG on silica, respectively, confirming an exogenic adsorption process consistent with the findings of other studies.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The considered heterostructure model contains 391 (392) atoms in the unit cell for the simulation with (without) S-vacancy, corresponding to a density of S-vacancies of ρ v ≈ 1.8 × 10 13 cm –2 . We keep the lattice constant of graphene unchanged at a 0 = 2.46 Å , and compressed the lattice constant of MoS 2 by roughly ∼2.4%: from 3.15 Å to 3.075 Å. We considered a supercell with about 18 Å of vacuum along the c -direction between periodic images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%