2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.elspec.2014.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide studied by the XRD, TEM and electron spectroscopy methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

58
696
0
23

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,525 publications
(777 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
58
696
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…3 gives the XRD spectrum of the GO. A typical single strong peak appeared at approximately 10˚ [24], which indicates that the oxygen functional groups have penetrated onto the surface of graphene. An average thickness of 0.328 nm (single sheet) was also calculated from the XRD pattern according to the Scherrer equation with a constant (K) equal to 0.89 [24].…”
Section: Characterisation Of Graphene Oxidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 gives the XRD spectrum of the GO. A typical single strong peak appeared at approximately 10˚ [24], which indicates that the oxygen functional groups have penetrated onto the surface of graphene. An average thickness of 0.328 nm (single sheet) was also calculated from the XRD pattern according to the Scherrer equation with a constant (K) equal to 0.89 [24].…”
Section: Characterisation Of Graphene Oxidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its electron concentration was below 10 16 cm −3 . GO flakes were obtained by oxidation of graphite powder as per the modified Hummers method [2,3]. Light to dark yellow-brown GO is highly hydrophilic and forms stable aqueous suspension.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrophobized MM probably forms aggregates in the aqueous phase which can stiffen the internal structure of MUC solution, and this explains the increase of both G' and G''. On the contrary, GOx is hydrophilic but has very high surface area (~ 150 m 2 /g - Stobinski et al, 2014), which allows effective binding to polar moieties of MUC molecules, increasing the crosslinking interactions. BT, which is also hydrophilic, does not have such a large surface area (~ 67 m 2 /g -Kondej and Sosnowski, 2013) so cannot bind to MUC so efficiently.…”
Section: Part II Influence Of Nanostructure Particles (Nps) On Transmentioning
confidence: 99%