2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2021.108713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphene paper with electrodeposited NiCo2S4 nanoparticles as a novel flexible sensor for simultaneous detection of folic acid and ascorbic acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EIS was studied at the open circuit potential at an AC voltage of 5 mV over the frequency range 0.1–1 × 10 5 Hz. The electroactive surface area of the ZnCo-MOF/GS electrode was determined by using the Randles–Sevcik equation as described in our previous studies. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EIS was studied at the open circuit potential at an AC voltage of 5 mV over the frequency range 0.1–1 × 10 5 Hz. The electroactive surface area of the ZnCo-MOF/GS electrode was determined by using the Randles–Sevcik equation as described in our previous studies. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electroactive surface area of the ZnCo-MOF/ GS electrode was determined by using the Randles−Sevcik equation as described in our previous studies. 59,60 The capacitance performance of the prepared ZnCo-MOF/GS material was carried out in 3.0 M KOH aqueous solution and calculated by…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 2D, GSM shows approximately 1.5 times the resistance of the GP prepared in our previous studies. 46,47 Although the electrical conductivity of GSM is lower than GP, it exhibits a higher electroactive surface area due to possessing a porous structure.…”
Section: Mechanical Strength and Flexibility Of Gsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AA electrochemical detection can be performed in two possible ways, (i) enzymatic and (ii) non-enzymatic. [4][5][6] Among these two, the enzymatic sensors have major disadvantages due to the high cost, limited working conditions, and lack of reproducibility. On the other hand, non-enzymatic detection holds significance due to its stability and high sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%