Graphic Correlation 1995
DOI: 10.2110/pec.95.53.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphic Correlation: A Powerful Stratigraphic Technique Comes of Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3), allowing construction of a CSRS by means of graphic correlation (Mitchell et al . 1994; Mann & Lane 1995). Time units in this system are measured in terms of metres of the CSRS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3), allowing construction of a CSRS by means of graphic correlation (Mitchell et al . 1994; Mann & Lane 1995). Time units in this system are measured in terms of metres of the CSRS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Eocene-Oligocene transition is marked by large-scale extinction of organisms, and floral and faunal turnover and changes (Frederiksen, 1988;Haasl and Hansen, 1996; Oboh settings such as continental, coastal and marginal marine (Rull, 2002). Graphic correlation is a fundamental method that offers improved stratigraphic resolution and enhanced accuracy and precision end results (Mann and Lane, 1995;Krebs et al, 1997;Krebs, 2011).…”
Section: Introduction E-issn 2082-0259mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of a standard reference section in graphic correlation and the selection of a GSSP are similar processes in that both seek to find, within a defined chronostratigraphic interval, a stratigraphic section that, ideally, has the following characteristics: 1) a thick, continuous record of rock accumulation that is free of sedimentological and structural breaks, 2) absence of strong diagenetic and metamorphic alteration, 3) absence of broad vertical facies changes, and 4) abundant, diverse, and well-preserved fossils that exhibit short stratigraphic ranges (rapid evolution) and wide geographic ranges (international correlation potential) (Remane et al , 1996). Figure 4 displays details of the graphic correlation technique, and further discussion of the method can be found in Shaw (1964), Edwards (1982Edwards ( , 1984Edwards ( , 1989, and Mann and Lane (1995). The GSSP selection process ends when international consensus is reached on a stratotype-section and the definition of chronostratigraphic point/s within this section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%