2018
DOI: 10.5958/0975-928x.2018.00115.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphical analysis for fruit yield and its component traits in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fruit yield per plant has also shown negatively and insignificantly correlated with diameter of fruit (-0.119). The findings of positive correlation are also confirmatory with Patel and Patel (2014), Yatung et al (2014) and Dolkar et al (2015), Patel et al (2015), Sharma andSridevi (2016), andMamatha et al (2016). In contrast, fruit yield showed positive and nonsignificant correlation with days to 1 st flowering (0.154), number of branches per plant (0.149), number of seeds per plant (0.048) and weight of 1000 seeds (0.119).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fruit yield per plant has also shown negatively and insignificantly correlated with diameter of fruit (-0.119). The findings of positive correlation are also confirmatory with Patel and Patel (2014), Yatung et al (2014) and Dolkar et al (2015), Patel et al (2015), Sharma andSridevi (2016), andMamatha et al (2016). In contrast, fruit yield showed positive and nonsignificant correlation with days to 1 st flowering (0.154), number of branches per plant (0.149), number of seeds per plant (0.048) and weight of 1000 seeds (0.119).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The path coefficient analysis (Table 4) showed that, weight of individual fruit (0.293) had highest positive direct effects on fruit yield per plant followed by plant height (0.205), number of branches per plant (0.186), length of fruit (0.164), number of fruits per plant (0.132) and diameter of fruit (0.078) which is in agreement with Yatung et al, (2014), Pandit and Adhikary (2014), Patel et al, (2015), Mamatha et al, (2016) and Sharma and Sridevi (2016). On the other hand, the direct negative effects were recorded for days to 1 st flowering (-0.148), number of seeds per fruit (-0.133) and weight of thousand seeds (-0.211) on fruit yield per plant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Characterization of chili genotypes based on their diverse phenotypic and genotypic selection are mandatory and help to increase chili production and mitigate the problem which are related to different stresses. Breeding programs for crop improvement are enabled by the availability and detailed characterization of genetically diverse germplasm (Usman et al, 2014;Patel et al, 2015;Ridzuan et al, 2019). Heritability is linked with some important traits and provides opportunities to improve new desirable plants (Lahbib et al, 2013;Patel et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the selection of genotypes favorable to this association is a field of research to be explored in order to consolidate the inoculation technology with diazotrophic PGPB as a viable alternative to synthetic nitrogen fertilizers for maize production. In this context, diallel analysis is an essential tool to identify superior parents for hybrid or cultivar development related to several traits of interest (Patel et al, 1998). Thus, the objectives of this work were to determine, using partial diallel crossing, the general and specific combining ability of twelve elite inbred lines of maize with three tester lines and to verify their possible interactions with A. brasilense strain Ab-V5.…”
Section: Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%