1981
DOI: 10.1109/tchmt.1981.1135792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphical Solution for the Back Pressurization Method of Hermetic Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of small volume devices (<1 mm 3 ), the minimum detectable leak rate L min is given by equation (1) [7]:…”
Section: Determination Of the Helium Leak Detection Methods Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of small volume devices (<1 mm 3 ), the minimum detectable leak rate L min is given by equation (1) [7]:…”
Section: Determination Of the Helium Leak Detection Methods Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically the package is placed into a helium pressurized chamber, for a duration t b ('bombing' step), and then the helium leak rate is measured by the mass spectrometer after a time t d . The helium leak rate measured can be described by Howell-Mann's equation (7):…”
Section: Reminder On the Helium Leak Test Using A Mass Spectrometermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stanley Ruthberg has published curves showing the quantitative effect of the time between bomb and test, on the two L values. [6] The primary reason for the gross leak test is to detect large leak rates. Packages with large leaks can pass the fine leak test because most of the helium has leaked out of the package between bombing and test.…”
Section: Fixed Methods Of Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%