2005
DOI: 10.1021/jp052174e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphite-Incorporated MoS2 Nanotubes:  A New Coaxial Binary System

Abstract: Graphite-filled MoS2 nanotubes were synthesized by pyrolizing propylene inside MoS2 nanotubes prepared by a template-assisted technique. The large coaxial nanotubes were constituted of graphite sheets inserted between the MoS2 layers, forming the outer part, and coaxial multiwall carbon nanotubes intercalated with MoS2 inside. High-resolution electron microscopy (HREM) and electron energy loss spectroscopy techniques along with molecular dynamics simulation and quantum mechanical calculations were used to char… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electron energy loss spectrum (EELS) of the interface is shown in Figure 4c, revealing the characteristic peaks of Mo at 35 eV (M 3 -edge), S at 165 eV (L 2,3 -edge), Ti at 460 eV (L 2 L 3 -edge), and O at 532 eV. [27][28][29] Elemental mapping results of Ti, S, and Mo (the inset in Figure 4c) show the distribution of each element. The separation of Ti distribution area from Mo and S further proves that the MoS 2 does stand rather than coat on TiO 2 surface with little interfacial diffusion.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/aenm201600464mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Electron energy loss spectrum (EELS) of the interface is shown in Figure 4c, revealing the characteristic peaks of Mo at 35 eV (M 3 -edge), S at 165 eV (L 2,3 -edge), Ti at 460 eV (L 2 L 3 -edge), and O at 532 eV. [27][28][29] Elemental mapping results of Ti, S, and Mo (the inset in Figure 4c) show the distribution of each element. The separation of Ti distribution area from Mo and S further proves that the MoS 2 does stand rather than coat on TiO 2 surface with little interfacial diffusion.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/aenm201600464mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the clear atomic bonding of the interface between MoS 2 and TiO 2 is not resolved on account of the thickness of TiO 2 . Electron energy loss spectrum (EELS) of the interface is shown in Figure c, revealing the characteristic peaks of Mo at 35 eV (M 3 ‐edge), S at 165 eV (L 2,3 ‐edge), Ti at 460 eV (L 2 L 3 ‐edge), and O at 532 eV . Elemental mapping results of Ti, S, and Mo (the inset in Figure c) show the distribution of each element.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EELS spectrum obtained from the location, indicated by the red dot in Fig. 2i, reveals the characteristic peaks of Mo at 35 eV (N-edge) and S at 165 eV (L-edge) 13 . The ratio of Mo and S is about 1:2, which is confirmed by the XPS data (see Supplementary…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by using lasers or electron beams, or by thermal evaporation and condensation was outlined. [42][43][44][45][46] In addition, Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles, 47 CNTs, 48,49 fullerene-like MoS 2 pods, [50][51][52] and Li and Mg ions 53 were also successfully encapsulated inside MoS 2 NTs. Molecular dynamic simulations suggest that encapsulating of MoS 2 NTs with PbI 2 obeys the Lucas-Washburn equation whereas filling of CNTs follows a modified expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%