2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphitic carbon nitride-carbon nanofiber as oxygen catalyst in anion-exchange membrane water electrolyzer and rechargeable metal–air cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AEM water electrolyzer systems, which possess the advantages of both AWE and PEM water electrolyzer systems without their weak points, can produce high‐purity hydrogen using an anion exchange membrane as a solid polymer electrolyte. [ 18–22 ] They can operate in an alkaline environment, allowing the use of non‐noble metal catalysts. [ 18–22 ] However, the performance of AEM water electrolyzer systems (200–400 mA cm −2 at 1.8–2.4 V) is lower than that of PEM water electrolyzer systems (600–2000 mA cm −2 at 1.8–2.2 V).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AEM water electrolyzer systems, which possess the advantages of both AWE and PEM water electrolyzer systems without their weak points, can produce high‐purity hydrogen using an anion exchange membrane as a solid polymer electrolyte. [ 18–22 ] They can operate in an alkaline environment, allowing the use of non‐noble metal catalysts. [ 18–22 ] However, the performance of AEM water electrolyzer systems (200–400 mA cm −2 at 1.8–2.4 V) is lower than that of PEM water electrolyzer systems (600–2000 mA cm −2 at 1.8–2.2 V).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 18–22 ] They can operate in an alkaline environment, allowing the use of non‐noble metal catalysts. [ 18–22 ] However, the performance of AEM water electrolyzer systems (200–400 mA cm −2 at 1.8–2.4 V) is lower than that of PEM water electrolyzer systems (600–2000 mA cm −2 at 1.8–2.2 V). [ 23,24 ] This can be attributed to the poor OER performance of non‐noble metal based electrocatalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a low overpotential is comparable to the state‐of‐the‐art OER catalysts such as IrO 2 , RuO 2 and transition metal based catalysts . The OER parameters of typical catalysts in 1.0 mol L −1 KOH are listed in Table . This result indicates the possibility of designing highly active OER photo‐responsive electrocatalysts with earth‐abundant non‐metallic elements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…51 In terms of bifunctional catalysis (OER/ORR), the design and choice of catalysts are nearly identical between alkaline fuel cells and aqueous MABs. [55][56][57] The performance of bifunctional catalysts takes into account both the ORR and OER direction of reaction. Instead of a single onset potential, the performance index of (D) Output from calculations showing that a catalyst optimization process of moving up the volcano plot, or optimized within the constraints of the linear scaling relationship (d optimized) followed by moving beyond the volcano plot, or optimized without the constraints of the liner scaling relationship (ε optimized) is optimal.…”
Section: Alkaline Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%