2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-015-0574-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphitization of Coke and Its Interaction with Slag in the Hearth of a Blast Furnace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 show that there is an obvious shift of the carbon peak positions of the deadman cokes towards the right side compared with the feed coke, indicating that graphite crystals of the deadman coke possess a lower interlayer spacing d 002 than the feed coke. The d 002 value of all deadman coke fines is estimated to be about 0.339 nm which is very close to the interlayer spacing of pure graphite (0.338 nm 10) ). The crystallite height of the carbons of deadman coke fines is larger and increases from 24.31 to 44.35 nm from DM1.8-F to DM > 5.0-F, which is about 5-10 times the value of the crystallite height of the feed coke.…”
Section: The Analysis Of the Carbon Structure Of The Deadman Cokessupporting
confidence: 51%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…9 show that there is an obvious shift of the carbon peak positions of the deadman cokes towards the right side compared with the feed coke, indicating that graphite crystals of the deadman coke possess a lower interlayer spacing d 002 than the feed coke. The d 002 value of all deadman coke fines is estimated to be about 0.339 nm which is very close to the interlayer spacing of pure graphite (0.338 nm 10) ). The crystallite height of the carbons of deadman coke fines is larger and increases from 24.31 to 44.35 nm from DM1.8-F to DM > 5.0-F, which is about 5-10 times the value of the crystallite height of the feed coke.…”
Section: The Analysis Of the Carbon Structure Of The Deadman Cokessupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The cokes were crushed to passing less than 74 μm and then were ashed by heating in air at 1 088 K (815°C) to remove carbon similar to the previous studies. 10,13) The samples for carbon structure identification were not treated by ashing process. XRD spectra were obtained using a Bruker diffractometer (D8 ADVANCE, Germany) as well as Cu (Kα) radiation.…”
Section: The Analysis Methods and Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations