2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.103000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graptolites as fossil geo-thermometers and source material of hydrocarbons: An overview of four decades of progress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
(570 reference statements)
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, their arrangement may intensify the permeability anisotropy of shale [20]. Furthermore, studies also indicated that some types of OM grains without organic pores might still exhibit anisotropy in their inner structure due to their biogenetic texture [21], which may also affect the anisotropy of shale if they were directionally arranged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, their arrangement may intensify the permeability anisotropy of shale [20]. Furthermore, studies also indicated that some types of OM grains without organic pores might still exhibit anisotropy in their inner structure due to their biogenetic texture [21], which may also affect the anisotropy of shale if they were directionally arranged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Lower Paleozoic and Precambrian shales, solid bitumen reflectance (BR o ) and/or graptolite reflectance (GR o ) are commonly applied as maturity indicators owing to the unavailability of vitrinite reflectance (VR o ) (Bertrand and Malo, 2001;Valentine et al, 2014;Sanei et al, 2015;Luo et al, 2017). However, the two macerals suitable for reflectance measurement do not always occur in these shales (Petersen et al, 2013), and their measured reflectance values do not always accurately reflect the maturity, being restricted by their origin, size and optical anisotropy (Schoenherr et al, 2007;Suárez-Ruiz et al, 2012;Sanei et al, 2015;Luo et al, 2019). Effective maturity indicators of Lower Paleozoic and Precambrian marine shales are still in process of development (Caricchi et al, 2016;Luo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the two macerals suitable for reflectance measurement do not always occur in these shales (Petersen et al, 2013), and their measured reflectance values do not always accurately reflect the maturity, being restricted by their origin, size and optical anisotropy (Schoenherr et al, 2007;Suárez-Ruiz et al, 2012;Sanei et al, 2015;Luo et al, 2019). Effective maturity indicators of Lower Paleozoic and Precambrian marine shales are still in process of development (Caricchi et al, 2016;Luo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of methods are widely used to characterize pores in shales, including field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), atomic-force microscopy (AFM), computed tomography (CT) scanning, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), He-pycnometry, low-temperature gas adsorption (CO 2 and N 2 ), mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) and small-angle neutron/X-ray scattering (Loucks et al, 2009;Sisk et al, 2010;Sondergeld et al, 2010;Javadpour et al, 2012;Tinni et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2015a;Han et al, 2016aHan et al, , 2020bSun et al, 2017Sun et al, , 2020Luo et al, 2020). Porosity and pore-size distribution obtained from different methods may vary due to different principles and pore-size range detection (Bertier et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%