Grass-Land Classification With Ahp in Aso Region for Landscape Preservation

Yin, H.; Morozumi, Mitsuo; Iki, Kazuhisa; Homma, Riken

doi:10.3130/aija.64.231_2

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To this end, a multi-criteria decision-making process is employed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) developed by the mathematician Thomas L. Saaty at the Wharton School of the Contact Author: Atsushi Toshimori, Faculty of Library and Information Science, Univ. of Library and Information Science, 1-2 Kasuga, Tsukuba 305-8550 Japan Tel: +81-298-59-1350 Fax: +81-298-53-1093 e-mail: tosimori@ulis.ac.jp (Received September 7, 2001; accepted December 16, 2001) University of Pennsylvania (1980,1996) and applied by such authors as Yin et al (1999) and Homma et al (1998). We believe the AHP method is appropriate for building consensus among those involved in urban residential upgrading in Jakarta.…”

Section: Objective Of the Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Application of the AHP to Urban Residential Upgrading in Jakarta

Batubara

Tanimura

Asikhia

et al. 2002

Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents an application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in building consensus among experts on the choice of urban residential upgrading schemes in Jakarta, Indonesia. Questionnaires were administered to both international and Indonesian experts involved in residential upgrading in our study area. Given the goal of urban residential improvement, they were asked to weigh such alternatives as multi-storey housing (MS), single-detached housing (SD), and Kampung Improvement Program (KIP) based on such criteria as tenure, floor area, accessibility to work place, accessibility to transportation and lifestyle. It was found that accessibility to work place was the most important criterion while multi-storey housing was the single most preferred housing improvement scheme contrary to the popular program (KIP) promoted by international aid agencies.

show abstract

Section: Objective Of the Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%