1998
DOI: 10.1080/10220119.1998.9647937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grass species composition, yield and quality under and outside tree crowns in a semi‐arid rangeland in south‐western Zimbabwe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Kennard and Walker (1973), Stuart-Hill et al (1987), Belsky et al (1989), Veenendaal et al (1993), Smit and Swart (1994) and Asferachew et al (1998) reported a grass species turnover from under canopy to the open areas. De Ridder et al (1996) and Moyo and Campbell (1998) on the other hand reported that there was no effect of canopy on grass species.…”
Section: Effect Of Sub-habitats On Grass Layer and Soil Parametersmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, Kennard and Walker (1973), Stuart-Hill et al (1987), Belsky et al (1989), Veenendaal et al (1993), Smit and Swart (1994) and Asferachew et al (1998) reported a grass species turnover from under canopy to the open areas. De Ridder et al (1996) and Moyo and Campbell (1998) on the other hand reported that there was no effect of canopy on grass species.…”
Section: Effect Of Sub-habitats On Grass Layer and Soil Parametersmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Van Oudtshoorn [22] describes decreaser species as those species that have high grazing value but decrease when veld deteriorates under high grazing pressure and trampling; Increaser I species as those that increase when the veld is underutilized; Increaser II species as those that increase with light to moderate grazing pressure and Increaser III species as those that increase with light to severe grazing pressure. The abundance of the species in the selected areas was also assessed as described by Moyo and Campbell [23], Jauworo et al [24] and Ravhuhali [25], and Ravhuhali et al [26]. With regards to abundance status, a grass species was classified as dominant (D), common (C), rare (R), or present (P) if its density was more than 13%, between 3 and 13%, between 1 and 3%, or less than 1%, respectively [22].…”
Section: Soil and Grass Sampling And Species Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%