1999
DOI: 10.1126/science.283.5399.229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grassland Vegetation Changes and Nocturnal Global Warming

Abstract: Global minimum temperatures ( T MIN ) are increasing faster than maximum temperatures, but the ecological consequences of this are largely unexplored. Long-term data sets from the shortgrass steppe were used to identify correlations between T MIN and several vegetation variables. This ecosystem is potentially sensitive to increases in T MIN . Most notably, increased spring T MIN … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
217
2
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
217
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the spatial variation in the magnitude and direction of change for the parameters tested (Tables III-VI), and highlighted by the geographical anomalies of neighbouring sites (Figure 2), we believe that no one site evaluated in this study is 'typical' of the region. The alarming trend in minimum temperature of 0.12°C/year reported by Alward et al (1999) for CPER since 1970 was four times higher than the average of the other ten stations used in this study over the same period (0.03°C/year) and 12 times higher than the long-term (80+ years) average rate (0.01°C/year). The site was also atypical in trends in summer temperatures and growing-season days.…”
Section: No One Site (In This Study) Is 'Typical' Of the Regionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the spatial variation in the magnitude and direction of change for the parameters tested (Tables III-VI), and highlighted by the geographical anomalies of neighbouring sites (Figure 2), we believe that no one site evaluated in this study is 'typical' of the region. The alarming trend in minimum temperature of 0.12°C/year reported by Alward et al (1999) for CPER since 1970 was four times higher than the average of the other ten stations used in this study over the same period (0.03°C/year) and 12 times higher than the long-term (80+ years) average rate (0.01°C/year). The site was also atypical in trends in summer temperatures and growing-season days.…”
Section: No One Site (In This Study) Is 'Typical' Of the Regionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…That is, there was also a strong disconnect seasonally, with very few sites showing consistent trends for all seasons; the summer season was the least consistent in minimum and maximum temperatures across the region. This could be unsettling for the agriculture and livestock industry, where decreasing growing season, and minimum and maximum temperatures, at some sites may reduce productivity, while increasing minimum temperatures at other sites may facilitate less desirable invasive plant species (Alward et al, 1999). Unfortunately, temperature trends in the summer growing season were not unidirectional (e.g.…”
Section: Inconsistencies In the Responses Of Multiple Temperature Parmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature is another factor. Increasing spring minimum temperatures correlates with decreased C 4 productivity and benefits C 3 species since C 3 plants are growing most rapidly during spring (Alward et al, 1999). Flourishing cool season species could effectively reduce the amount of resources available to warm season species that begin their growth peaks later in the year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows making investigations on one or a few, mostly dominant species as representatives of functional types. Different plant functional types, according to their life form, phenology, vegetative growth, rooting pattern or photosynthesis type, often respond differently to natural or experimentally simulated climatic stresses (Mamolos et al 2001, Fay et al 2002, Xia & Wan 2013, Wertin et al 2015, which may result in changes in the dominance structure and composition of the community (Alward et al 1999, Zavaleta et al 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%