1997
DOI: 10.2190/ccte-28lu-pe5k-umkm
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravels and Travels: A Comment on Andrefsky's “Cascade Phase Lithic Technology”

Abstract: The presence of chert in mid-Holocene lithic assemblages along the Snake River has been attributed to long distance mobility, with the material introduced in bifacial form to the canyons from upland quarries. Geological field studies, however, show that chert, argillite, and quartzite are common in terrace and alluvial gravels along the lower Snake River. These lithologies probably provided a major source of high quality raw material for populations wintering near the river throughout the Holocene.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies take into consideration only the primary lithic source of specific materials and do not address the distribution of these materials in secondary deposits. This oversight has obvious implications, as has been pointed out by previous investigations (e.g., Shackley, 1992;Watrall, 1976;Wyckoff, 1993; and most recently, Reid, 1997). The information contained in this article is intended to provide a preliminary baseline against which the archaeological record can be compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Other studies take into consideration only the primary lithic source of specific materials and do not address the distribution of these materials in secondary deposits. This oversight has obvious implications, as has been pointed out by previous investigations (e.g., Shackley, 1992;Watrall, 1976;Wyckoff, 1993; and most recently, Reid, 1997). The information contained in this article is intended to provide a preliminary baseline against which the archaeological record can be compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, we can never say with absolute certainty the exact locations of raw material sources because of the multitude of problems associated with assigning an artifact to a specific primary source (i.e. intra-source variability (Shackley, 1998); secondary source transport (Church, 2000;Reid, 1997)). Furthermore identification to an exact primary source location is not a useful behavioral variable at Kanjera South because most artifacts are produced on river cobbles (Braun et al, in press).…”
Section: Raw Materials Sourcingmentioning
confidence: 99%