2022
DOI: 10.1007/jhep12(2022)058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational Faraday effect from on-shell amplitudes

Abstract: Effects of massive object’s spin on massive-massless 2 → 2 classical scattering is studied. Focus is set on the less-considered dimensionless expansion parameter λ/b, where λ is the massless particle’s wavelength and b is the impact parameter. Corrections in λ/b start to appear from $$ \mathcal{O} $$ O (G2), with leading correction terms tied to the gravitational Faraday effect, which is a special case of the Lense-Thirring effect. We compute the eikonal phase up to $$ \mathca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us end by briefly commenting on previous attempts to construct the Compton amplitude using BCFW recursion on a classical three-point amplitude, namely refs. [25,81]. It was stated in ref.…”
Section: Opposite-helicity Compton Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us end by briefly commenting on previous attempts to construct the Compton amplitude using BCFW recursion on a classical three-point amplitude, namely refs. [25,81]. It was stated in ref.…”
Section: Opposite-helicity Compton Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The authors of refs. [25,81] missed the former effect, and their accounting of the latter two did not produce O( × 1/ ) terms. 11 Though inconsequential in the black-hole limit, the lack of such effects renders the results of those previous analyses for general spin-induced multipoles discrepant with refs.…”
Section: Opposite-helicity Compton Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nevertheless, a comparison between the functions arising in the high-energy limit of [34,35] and [24,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and their dependence on the rapidity γ ′ = (p 1 • p 2 )/(m 1 m 2 ) shows remarkable similarities with our results expressed in terms of our γ = (n • p)/m. It is tempting to suggest that the quantization of the electromagnetic (and gravitational) field is eventually needed if we are interested in obtaining radiative observables 18 free of mass singularities in perturbation theory, as shown earlier with our analysis of classical and quantum results.…”
Section: Quantum Theory: the Resolution For A Smooth Limitmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Other observables for the wave scattering problem have been studied with modern on-shell techniques, mostly working in the geometric optics approximation in order to make contact with the eikonal expansion [13][14][15][16][17] but also beyond [12,18,19]. In particular quantum long-range effects have been taken into account within an effective field theory approach to gravity, with interesting consequences for the equivalence principle [14,[20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Jhep10(2023)108mentioning
confidence: 99%