2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational fragmentation caught in the act: the filamentary Musca molecular cloud

Abstract: Context. Filamentary structures are common in molecular clouds. Explaining how they fragment to dense cores is a missing step in understanding their role in star formation. Aims. We perform a case study of whether low-mass filaments are close to hydrostatic prior to their fragmentation, and whether their fragmentation agrees with gravitational fragmentation models. To accomplish this, we study the ∼6.5 pc long Musca molecular cloud, which is an ideal candidate for a filament at an early stage of fragmentation.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
112
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
15
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we find that G0.253 +0.016 in the CMZ has similar filament properties as seen in spiral-arm clouds, e.g., that over-dense regions are located along filaments (see Figure 1). It is remarkable that the filament width of 0.05 0.15 pc -found in observations of nearby spiralarms clouds in the Milky Way is close to universal (Arzoumanian et al 2011;Benedettini et al 2015;Federrath 2016;Kainulainen et al 2016). It is even more remarkable that we find here a filament width of =  W 0.17 0.08 pc fil for the CMZ cloud G0.253+0.016, consistent with W fil in the solar neighborhood.…”
Section: The Sonic Scale and Filament Widthsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Here we find that G0.253 +0.016 in the CMZ has similar filament properties as seen in spiral-arm clouds, e.g., that over-dense regions are located along filaments (see Figure 1). It is remarkable that the filament width of 0.05 0.15 pc -found in observations of nearby spiralarms clouds in the Milky Way is close to universal (Arzoumanian et al 2011;Benedettini et al 2015;Federrath 2016;Kainulainen et al 2016). It is even more remarkable that we find here a filament width of =  W 0.17 0.08 pc fil for the CMZ cloud G0.253+0.016, consistent with W fil in the solar neighborhood.…”
Section: The Sonic Scale and Filament Widthsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…For Musca, we derive λ(0.1 pc) = 25 M /pc from Fig. 5 of Kainulainen et al (2016). That is, the ISF has a factor 3−6 higher line density that these nearby filaments.…”
Section: Two Mass Scales For Molecular Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Another possibility could be large-enough, pre-existing density fluctuations that can grow and collapse faster than the global, longitudinal collapse ensues (Larson 1985;Pon et al 2011). Supporting this possibility, filaments with low star formation activity have been observed to contain significant density fluctuations (e.g., Roy et al 2015;Kainulainen et al 2016). Developing this cartoon framework into a coherent theory is beyond this paper, but it would be a crucial topic for future works that aim at understand the fragmentation of highly super-critical filaments.…”
Section: Comparison Against Gravitational Fragmentation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filamentary structures are fundamental building blocks of the molecular clouds of the interstellar medium (ISM), manifesting themselves over wide ranges of sizes (∼0.1-100 pc), masses (∼1-10 5 M ⊙ ), and line-masses ( 1 000 M ⊙ pc −1 ) (e.g., Bally et al 1987;Hacar et al 2013;Alves de Oliveira et al 2014;Kainulainen et al 2013Kainulainen et al , 2016Abreu-Vicente et al 2016). Specifically, filaments that have line-masses greatly in excess to the critical value of the self-gravitating, thermally supported, non-magnetised, infinitely long equilibrium model, i.e., ≫16 M ⊙ pc −1 (Ostriker 1964), contain large enough mass reservoirs to give birth to high-mass stars and star clusters (e.g., Pillai et al 2006;Beuther et al 2010Beuther et al , 2015aHenning et al 2010;Schneider et al 2012;Kainulainen et al 2013;Stutz & Gould 2016;Contreras et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%