2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.98.044049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational radiation in infinite derivative gravity and connections to effective quantum gravity

Abstract: The Hulse-Taylor binary provides possibly the best test of GR to date. We find the modified quadrupole formula for Infinite Derivative Gravity (IDG). We investigate the backreaction formula for propagation of gravitational waves, found previously for Effective Quantum Gravity (EQG) for a flat background and extend this calculation to a de Sitter background for both EQG and IDG. We put tighter constraints on EQG using new LIGO data. We also find the power emitted by a binary system within the IDG framework for … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the large separation limits as r → ∞, erf(r) → 1 , the memory takes the usual Einsteinian form as expected. On the other hand, since IDG is a small scale modification of GR, for lower bound on mass scale of non-locality (M > 4keV ) [44], the memory reproduces the GR result above at atomic distances.…”
Section: Memory Effect In Idgsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In the large separation limits as r → ∞, erf(r) → 1 , the memory takes the usual Einsteinian form as expected. On the other hand, since IDG is a small scale modification of GR, for lower bound on mass scale of non-locality (M > 4keV ) [44], the memory reproduces the GR result above at atomic distances.…”
Section: Memory Effect In Idgsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In the large distance limits, memory is the same as the usual Einsteinian form as expected. Furthermore, for a lower bound on mass scale of non-locality (M > 4keV ) [37], the memory reduces to GR prediction above at very small distances.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%