2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational wave denoising of binary black hole mergers with deep learning

Abstract: Gravitational wave detection requires an in-depth understanding of the physical properties of gravitational wave signals, and the noise from which they are extracted. Understanding the statistical properties of noise is a complex endeavor, particularly in realistic detection scenarios. In this article we demonstrate that deep learning can handle the non-Gaussian and non-stationary nature of gravitational wave data, and showcase its application to denoise the gravitational wave signals generated by the binary b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(90 reference statements)
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approaches are as diverse as Bayesian inference, machine learning, deep learning, and citizen science [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Recent examples of glitch mitigation are reported in [23][24][25][26]. Reference [23] describes various deglitching methods to extract the strong glitch present in the LIGO-Livingston detector about 1s before the merger of the binary neutron star that produced the signal GW170817 [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The approaches are as diverse as Bayesian inference, machine learning, deep learning, and citizen science [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Recent examples of glitch mitigation are reported in [23][24][25][26]. Reference [23] describes various deglitching methods to extract the strong glitch present in the LIGO-Livingston detector about 1s before the merger of the binary neutron star that produced the signal GW170817 [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glitch reduction, together with other techniques, was shown to improve the statistical significance of a GW trigger. In addition, deep learning approaches have also proven very effective to recover the true GW signal even in the presence of glitches [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When used for source detection, the inferred rate of false positives of these methods strongly depends on the completeness of the training data. For instance, one must verify that training includes all possible sources of systematics, including glitches (non-Gaussian noise; Wei & Huerta (2020); George et al (2018); Zevin et al (2017)). One must also take care that such systematics are distributed in realistic proportion to each other and to true signal events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [40], machine learning methods based on the dictionaries built from numerical-relativity templates of gravitational-wave signals were applied for data denoising, with satisfactory results for signals embedded in simulated Gaussian noise and some promising results for application on real gravitational-wave signals. Deep learning was applied in [41,42] for the noise reduction in the gravitational-wave detector data. The authors in [43] proposed deep filtering, which utilized deep learning with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for detection and parameter estimation of gravitational-waves from BBH mergers, with signals being embedded in actual LIGO noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%