2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.80.124047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational wave signatures of the absence of an event horizon: Nonradial oscillations of a thin-shell gravastar

Abstract: Gravitational waves from compact objects provide information about their structure, probing deep into strong-gravity regions. Here we illustrate how the presence or absence of an event horizon can produce qualitative differences in the gravitational waves emitted by ultracompact objects. In order to set up a straw-man ultracompact object with no event horizon, but which is otherwise almost identical to a black hole, we consider a nonrotating thin-shell model inspired by Mazur and Mottola's gravastar, which has… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
174
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
6
174
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an illustrative example of a class of objects that can be nearly ruled out using the GW150914 data, [87] explore the possibility that the merging objects formed a gravastar, which is an object that combines an exterior Schwarzschild spacetime with an interior de Sitter spacetime, with a layer of exotic matter in between [88,89,90]. It is important to recognize that even before the gravitational wave detection, such objects were not considered probable; there is no known mechanism to produce them, and the concatenation of spacetimes is arbitrary even if it is formally a solution to Einstein's equations.…”
Section: Constraints On Alternatives To Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an illustrative example of a class of objects that can be nearly ruled out using the GW150914 data, [87] explore the possibility that the merging objects formed a gravastar, which is an object that combines an exterior Schwarzschild spacetime with an interior de Sitter spacetime, with a layer of exotic matter in between [88,89,90]. It is important to recognize that even before the gravitational wave detection, such objects were not considered probable; there is no known mechanism to produce them, and the concatenation of spacetimes is arbitrary even if it is formally a solution to Einstein's equations.…”
Section: Constraints On Alternatives To Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, by comparing the theoretically obtained gravitational QNMs with the frequencies of the gravitational waves, one can confirm or refute the nature of the central engines of many astrophysical objects, since those modes differ for the different types of objects -black holes, superspinars (naked singularities), neutron stars, black hole mimickers etc. [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Quasi-normal Modes Of Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, by comparing the theoretically obtained gravitational QNMs with the frequencies of the gravitational waves, one can confirm or refute the nature of the central engines of many astrophysical objects, since those modes differ for the different types of objects -black holes, superspinars (naked singularities), neutron stars, black hole mimickers etc. [8][9][10][11][12][13].To find the QNMs, one needs to solve the second-order linear differential equations describing the linearized perturbations of the metric: the Regge-Wheeler equation (RWE) and the Zerilli equation for the Schwarzschild metric or the Teukolsky radial equation (TRE) for the Kerr metric and to impose the appropriate boundary conditions -the so-called black hole boundary conditions (waves going simultaneously into the horizon and into infinity) [1,3]. Additionally, one requires a regularity condition for the angular part of the solutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard tests of the nature of the final merged object call for the black hole's resonant frequencies [31][32][33], known as quasinormal mode (QNM) frequencies, to be extracted from the ringdown portion of the waveform and compared to theoretical calculations [34][35][36][37][38][39]. Working in the test particle limit, Cardoso et al [40] pointed out that in the case of highly compact wormholes, the ringdown of the final ECO is initially nearly identical to that of a BH despite the fact that QNM spectrum is radically changed [41][42][43]. A naive application of the QNM based tests would be fooled by a highly compact ECO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%