2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/789/1/34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravito-Turbulent Disks in Three Dimensions: Turbulent Velocities Versus Depth

Abstract: Characterizing turbulence in protoplanetary disks is crucial for understanding how they accrete and spawn planets. Recent measurements of spectral line broadening promise to diagnose turbulence, with different lines probing different depths. We use three-dimensional local hydrodynamic simulations of cooling, self-gravitating disks to resolve how motions driven by "gravito-turbulence" vary with height. We find that gravito-turbulence is practically as vigorous at altitude as at depth. Even though gas at altitud… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
58
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(98 reference statements)
11
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…used a Fourier analysis of GI in the shearing sheet approximation to show that the power spectrum of perturbations generated by the instability is contained in modes with wavelengths of a few H. Gammie (2001) finds essentially no power at scales much smaller than H, which are resolved in the calculations. A similar result has recently been obtained by Shi & Chiang (2014) using three dimensional shearing box simulations. Young & Clarke (2015) also show -in the context of fragmentation (see below) -that collapse of unstable modes is never initiated on scales H. These results imply that 'gravito-turbulence' extends over a very small range of lengthscales.…”
Section: The Onset Of Linear Instabilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…used a Fourier analysis of GI in the shearing sheet approximation to show that the power spectrum of perturbations generated by the instability is contained in modes with wavelengths of a few H. Gammie (2001) finds essentially no power at scales much smaller than H, which are resolved in the calculations. A similar result has recently been obtained by Shi & Chiang (2014) using three dimensional shearing box simulations. Young & Clarke (2015) also show -in the context of fragmentation (see below) -that collapse of unstable modes is never initiated on scales H. These results imply that 'gravito-turbulence' extends over a very small range of lengthscales.…”
Section: The Onset Of Linear Instabilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As a result, measurement of the fragmentation boundary (or stochastic fragmentation) in a 2D simulation is questionable, and better left to 3D simulations. They further argue that because of the quasi-regular nature of selfgravitating structures, stochastic fragmentation should be inhibited at very large β, because the growth and development of spiral structure occurs over a modest number of orbital periods, and thus may not be akin to a true turbulent cascade (see also Shi & Chiang (2014)). …”
Section: Convergence Of Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their figure 7 shows an increase in the velocity dispersion with vertical position in the disk. Shi & Chiang (2014) note that these high latitudes are not unstable by themselves but are forced to be turbulent by long-range gravitational forces from mass perturbations centered on the midplane. Observations of the variation of gas velocity dispersion with height in a galaxy might distinguish between gravity-driven turbulence and stellar-feedback driven turbulence on the scale of the disk thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Reynolds stress in GI fluctuates with radius and possesses negative values at some radii, and tracks the quasi-steady spiral structure. However, its contribution to the total stress is negligible in the simulations without magnetic field (see also Shi & Chiang 2014;Booth & Clarke 2018). Interestingly, the Reynolds stress increases in the GI-MHD simulations, with an averaged value 0.034 for grvmhd1 and 0.035 for grvmhd2.…”
Section: Turbulent Transportmentioning
confidence: 91%