SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1986 1986
DOI: 10.1190/1.1893153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity and magnetic 3‐D interactive inversion with constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magnetic anomalies are inverted assuming that anomalies are caused by undulations of the interface between the two layers in a model consisting of a surface layer and an underlying magnetized layer (Okuma et al, 1989). As for parameters of the analysis, mean depth of the magnetic basement is derived from least square fitting of the slope of the power spectrum of the reduction to the pole anomaly (Chenot and Debeglia, 1986). The mean depth was assumed to be 2,000 m below the ground surface in this study.…”
Section: Modeling For Long-wavelength Magnetic Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic anomalies are inverted assuming that anomalies are caused by undulations of the interface between the two layers in a model consisting of a surface layer and an underlying magnetized layer (Okuma et al, 1989). As for parameters of the analysis, mean depth of the magnetic basement is derived from least square fitting of the slope of the power spectrum of the reduction to the pole anomaly (Chenot and Debeglia, 1986). The mean depth was assumed to be 2,000 m below the ground surface in this study.…”
Section: Modeling For Long-wavelength Magnetic Anomalymentioning
confidence: 99%