2016
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20161070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity and magnetic studies of the eastern Mojave Desert, California and Nevada

Abstract: For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment-visit http://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1-888-ASK-USGS (1-888-275-8747).For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data reduction includes terrain corrections (Godson and Plouff, 1988), which remove the effect of topography, and isostatic corrections , which remove long-wavelength variations in the gravity field related to compensation of topographic loads. For additional details of the processing of these data, see Denton and Ponce (2016). These reduction methods are used to produce isostatic gravity anomalies that reflect the density variations of sources in the middle to upper crust (Fig.…”
Section: Gravity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Data reduction includes terrain corrections (Godson and Plouff, 1988), which remove the effect of topography, and isostatic corrections , which remove long-wavelength variations in the gravity field related to compensation of topographic loads. For additional details of the processing of these data, see Denton and Ponce (2016). These reduction methods are used to produce isostatic gravity anomalies that reflect the density variations of sources in the middle to upper crust (Fig.…”
Section: Gravity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models were constrained by combining gravity, magnetic, and MT data, geologic mapping and cross sections (Hewett, 1956;Olson et al, 1954;Burchfiel and Davis, 1988;Wooden and Miller, 1990;Fleck et al, 1994), drill-hole information (Castor, 2008;Langenheim et al, 2009), rock-property data , and depth-to-basement estimates (Langenheim et al, 2009). In the models, source bodies are assumed to have uniform average densities and magnetic susceptibility values that are derived from physical property measurements of rock samples from the study area (Table 1; Denton and Ponce, 2016). Combined, these constraints dramatically reduce the ambiguity and nonuniqueness inherent in geophysical models.…”
Section: Research Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All gravity data were tied to primary base stations in Primm, Nevada, as well as a secondary base station established near Mountain Pass, California. These stations ultimately were tied to high-precision gravity base station PB1021 near Baker, California, as part of a southern California high-precision gravity base-station network (Roberts and Jachens, 1986), as well as to a World Relative Gravity Reference Network of North America gravity base station at Nipton, California (Jablonski, 1974; see also, Denton and Ponce, 2016).…”
Section: Gravity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve understanding of the geophysical and structural framework of the carbonatite terrane, 19 MT stations, more than 2,300 gravity stations, and more than 640 physical rock property samples were collected across the eastern Mojave Desert region (Denton and Ponce, 2016). A regional aeromagnetic survey of parts of California was also used in this study (Roberts and Jachens, 1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%