1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00310065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity anomalies of the ridge-transform system in the South Atlantic between 31 and 34.5� S: Upwelling centers and variations in crustal thickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
355
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 385 publications
(382 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
25
355
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We calculated the magnetic anomaly by subtracting the appropriate International Geomagnetic Reference Field models, and then estimated the equivalent magnetization using the three-dimensional inversion method of (Parker and Huestis 1974;Macdonald et al 1980), assuming a 500-m-thick magnetized layer. We also calculated the free-air gravity anomaly, and then estimated the Mantle Bouguer anomaly by subtracting the predicted gravity effects of the seafloor relief and a 6-kmthick crust from the free-air gravity anomaly (Kuo and Forsyth 1988). Rock samples were also collected along the neo-volcanic zones within the axial valley and on some anomalous off-axis topographic highs, using dredge hauls and submersible dives.…”
Section: Rodriguez Triple Junction (Rtj) Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the magnetic anomaly by subtracting the appropriate International Geomagnetic Reference Field models, and then estimated the equivalent magnetization using the three-dimensional inversion method of (Parker and Huestis 1974;Macdonald et al 1980), assuming a 500-m-thick magnetized layer. We also calculated the free-air gravity anomaly, and then estimated the Mantle Bouguer anomaly by subtracting the predicted gravity effects of the seafloor relief and a 6-kmthick crust from the free-air gravity anomaly (Kuo and Forsyth 1988). Rock samples were also collected along the neo-volcanic zones within the axial valley and on some anomalous off-axis topographic highs, using dredge hauls and submersible dives.…”
Section: Rodriguez Triple Junction (Rtj) Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical models [e.g., Sparks et al, 1993] and observational geophysics [Kuo and Forsyth, 1988;Lin et al, 1990; Tolstoy et al, 1993] indicate that the least magmatic portions of slow spreading ridge segments are at segment ends where the ocean crust tends to be thin, the lithosphere is thick, and brittle deformation and fault throw are maximized [Shaw and Lin, 1993;Escartfn et al, 1997a]. Crustal morphology, gravity, and seafloor sampling also show that there is a consistent, strong asymmetry between inside-corner (IC) and outside-corner (OC) tectonic settings across the rift axis near segment ends [Tucholke and Lin, 1994].…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate the observation of variations in crustal structure along the ridge axis, the free-air anomalies were corrected for the gravity effects of seafloor topography and relief on the crust-mantle boundary assuming a constant crustal thickness and a constant density crust yielding mantle Bouguer anomalies (MBA) [Kuo and Forsyth, 1988 Figure 2d for location), show strong differences in amplitude for both data sets, but the great majority of the points fall along a straight line with a slope close to one, in the 95 These results suggest that we could use the MBA computed from satellite data to an analysis of the along axis variation in gravity along the MAR, and these results allow us to investigate variations at wavelengths greater than those possible using individual surveys. …”
Section: Gravity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%