2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-015-1174-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity data inversion for Moho depth modeling in the Hellenic area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both overriding and undergoing plates, four lithological/mechanical layers have been assumed, consisting of sedimentary cover, upper crust, lower crust, and upper mantle. The crustal structure, prevailing lithology, and thickness of the above layers have been retrieved mainly from regional-scale studies based on different and integrated geophysical data and methods, such as gravimetry, seismic reflection and refraction profiles, tomographic inversions based on P and S seismic waves arrival times, or receiver functions analyses (Tiberi et al, 2001, Tirel et al, 2004Zelt et al, 2005;Sodoudi et al, 2006;Makris et al, 2013;Kind et al, 2015;Grigoriadis et al, 2016;Sachpazi et al, 2016, among others). From the analysis of these studies it can be observed that the deepest Moho discontinuity occurs in the axial zone of the Hellenides fold-and-thrust belt with maximum values reaching 40-45 km of depth.…”
Section: Rheological Transects: Data and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For both overriding and undergoing plates, four lithological/mechanical layers have been assumed, consisting of sedimentary cover, upper crust, lower crust, and upper mantle. The crustal structure, prevailing lithology, and thickness of the above layers have been retrieved mainly from regional-scale studies based on different and integrated geophysical data and methods, such as gravimetry, seismic reflection and refraction profiles, tomographic inversions based on P and S seismic waves arrival times, or receiver functions analyses (Tiberi et al, 2001, Tirel et al, 2004Zelt et al, 2005;Sodoudi et al, 2006;Makris et al, 2013;Kind et al, 2015;Grigoriadis et al, 2016;Sachpazi et al, 2016, among others). From the analysis of these studies it can be observed that the deepest Moho discontinuity occurs in the axial zone of the Hellenides fold-and-thrust belt with maximum values reaching 40-45 km of depth.…”
Section: Rheological Transects: Data and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the Aegean realm presents a large spectrum of tectonic regimes (tensile, compressional, transcurrent) and examples of related active structures can be easily found and tested. Secondly, a fair amount of geological (Doutsos et al, 2006;Mountrakis, 2006) and geophysical data is available for the crustal structure (Sodoudi et al, 2006;Makris et al, 2013;Grigoriadis et al, 2016), as well as for the deformation rates (e.g., Hollenstein et al, 2008;Kreemer et al, 2014). Thirdly, the high seismicity rate that characterizes the Aegean Region allows for the recording of robust and independent seismological data (relocated earthquakes depths, focal mechanisms, spatial distribution of seismicity, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gomes-Ortiz and Agarwal (2015) generalized the Parker-Oldenburg's method for a 3D gravity inversion. The Parker-Oldenburg's method has been applied in local and (small-scale) regional studies, for instance, by Rui (1985), Reamer and Ferguson (1989), Ferguson et al (1988), Tiberi et al (2001), Tirel et al (2004), Gomes-Ortiz and Agarwal (2005), Shin et al (2006Shin et al ( , 2007Shin et al ( , 2015, Chappell and Kusznir (2008), Kiamehr and Gomes-Ortiz (2009), Block et al (2009), Prutkin and Saleh (2009), Hsieh et al (2010), Steffen et al (2011), Gómez-Ortiz et al (2011), Bagherbandi (2012), Jiang et al (2012), Aitken et al (2013), Prasanna et al (2013), Meijde et al (2013Meijde et al ( , 2015, Zhang et al (2015), and Grigoriadis et al (2016). The application of this method in (large-scale) regional, continental or global studies is, however, somehow restricted by the fact that this method is formulated in the frame of the Cartesian planar topocentric coordinates, while disregarding the Earth's sphericity.…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2015), and Grigoriadis et al. (2016). The application of this method in (large‐scale) regional, continental, or global studies is, however, somehow restricted by the fact that this method is formulated in the frame of the Cartesian planar topocentric coordinates, while disregarding the Earth's sphericity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The latter value has been accordingly assumed as more representative for this site. The estimates of the Moho depth are provided by several authors [Sodoudi et al, 2006;Raykova and Nikolova, 2007;Makris et al, 2013;Grigoriadis et al, 2016] using different methods, like P-and S-waves receiver functions, surface waves tomography, gravity data or gravity constrained by seismic profiles. Likely due to the different methodological approaches and original datasets, they provide a quite wide range of values between ~27 to ~40 km.…”
Section: Cephalonia Areamentioning
confidence: 99%