2015
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2015.1105916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity model estimation: fixed effects vs. random intercept Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining variables were little bit affect. The results are according to the literature (Anderson, 2011;Batra, 2006;De, 2013;Faustino and Proença, 2011;Kabir and Salim, 2010;Leitao and Tripathi, 2013;Prehn et al, 2016;Ranajoy et al, 2006). The results conclude that local sizes of economy enhance export, import and bilateral trade; while international economic mass is important for Pakistan; trade decreases when distance between two partners increases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The remaining variables were little bit affect. The results are according to the literature (Anderson, 2011;Batra, 2006;De, 2013;Faustino and Proença, 2011;Kabir and Salim, 2010;Leitao and Tripathi, 2013;Prehn et al, 2016;Ranajoy et al, 2006). The results conclude that local sizes of economy enhance export, import and bilateral trade; while international economic mass is important for Pakistan; trade decreases when distance between two partners increases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The former is used to surmount the problem of the traditional pooled cross-section method unable to cope with bilateral (exporter and/or importer) heterogeneity (Cheng & Wall, 2005;Anderson & Wincoop, 2003). However, this approach does not allow for the inclusion of key exporter and importer invariant factors, and subsequently excludes important economically relevant trade variables (Prehn et al, 2016). As our main focus is on time-constant variables, such as the Great Mekong Sub-region Cooperation, dummies indicating GMS member countries, and the geographical distance from Vietnam to its trading partners, the random-effects is more appropriate.…”
Section: Empirical Results -Baseline Regressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our main focus is on time-constant variables, such as the Great Mekong Sub-region Cooperation, dummies indicating GMS member countries, and the geographical distance from Vietnam to its trading partners, the random-effects is more appropriate. Therefore, we follow the literature (Kavallari et al, 2008;Keum, 2010;Prehn et al, 2016) and employ a panel random-effects approach to evaluate the trade flows between…”
Section: Empirical Results -Baseline Regressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some variables, such as distance lnðDistanceÞ and language (Language), will not change for any nation over time. Thus, the fixed-effect model is not appropriate when these variables are included (Liu, Lai, & Chen, 2012;Prehn, Brümmer, & Glauben, 2016). 2 As such, the random effect model is favoured under such circumstances.…”
Section: Results Of Model Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%