2016
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.22680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gray level Co‐occurrence Matrices (GLCM) to assess microstructural and textural changes in pre‐implantation embryos

Abstract: The preimplantation embryo is extraordinarily sensitive to environmental signals and events such that perturbations can alter embryo metabolism and program an altered developmental trajectory, ultimately affecting the phenotype of the adult individual; indeed, the physical environment associated with in vitro embryo culture can attenuate development. Defining the underlying metabolic changes and mechanisms, however, has been limited by the imaging technology used to evaluate metabolites and structural features… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of "pebble" texture or miliaria each decreased the skin surface uniformity and increased the randomness ( Figure 5, Figure 5, Panels A and C). [24][25][26] The presence of "pebble" texture increased the randomness (entropy) relative to no "pebble" texture or miliaria ( Figure 5 Figure 5, Panel C). Images with miliaria were more random than images with no visible textural features ( Figure 5 Figure 5, Panel C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of "pebble" texture or miliaria each decreased the skin surface uniformity and increased the randomness ( Figure 5, Figure 5, Panels A and C). [24][25][26] The presence of "pebble" texture increased the randomness (entropy) relative to no "pebble" texture or miliaria ( Figure 5 Figure 5, Panel C). Images with miliaria were more random than images with no visible textural features ( Figure 5 Figure 5, Panel C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GLCM texture outcomes were: (i) angular second moment (ASM, uniformity) that is mathematically the squared sum of GLCM elements, (ii) contrast (local gray level variation), (iii) correlation (gray level linear dependency), (iv) inverse difference moment (IDM, homogeneity) and (v) entropy (randomness or disorder). [24][25][26] Additional details of the GLCM method are provided in the On On-line Supplementary Document line Supplementary Document). 27…”
Section: Image Processing Colormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After each resolution unit is given a number based on its grayscale intensity, the software for texture analysis (in our study, we used the CellProfiler program) calculates textural features such as ASM and IDM. Since its establishment, the GLCM protocol has been successfully applied in various fields of medicine, including radiology, histology, pathology, and cell biology (Yang et al, 2012; Chen et al, 2015; Mapayi et al, 2015; Pantic et al, 2016 a ; Tan et al, 2016). Today, textural analysis can be done using various GLCM and non-GLCM algorithms and protocols, and many different programs for quantification of textural parameters have been developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their demonstration, they were able to classify cardiac activity of unknown compounds with an accuracy of roughly 72% and generalize the results to other drug families with an accuracy above 70% [218]. Further, ML and its myriad algorithms can also be used on the protein and gene side of tissue engineering, as it has been demonstrated or proposed for histopathological image analysis [43], ligand affinity [42], folding structure [219], gene expression and biomarker data mining [220, 221], and in evaluation of pre-implantation embryos [222]. Large datasets such as the “Tissue Atlas” [223], a human proteome map categorized by tissue, could easily be used as a training and testing set for ML algorithms targeting identification of impaired tissue or disease onset.…”
Section: Machine Learning and Precision Control For 3d Scaffold Fabrimentioning
confidence: 98%