2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grazing envelope evolution towards Type IIb supernovae

Abstract: I propose a scenario where the majority of the progenitors of type IIb supernovae (SNe IIb) lose most of their hydrogen-rich envelope during a grazing envelope evolution (GEE). In the GEE the orbital radius of the binary system is about equal to the radius of the giant star, and the more compact companion accretes mass through an accretion disk. The accretion disk is assumed to launch two opposite jets that efficiently remove gas from the envelope along the orbit of the companion. The efficient envelope remova… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of these runs should be taken with very great caution because mesa binary cannot properly treat the CEE. However, we do expect that in the GEE the system can get in and out of the CEE, and so the qualitative behaviour might hold, at least for the case with jets (Soker 2017).…”
Section: Numerical Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The results of these runs should be taken with very great caution because mesa binary cannot properly treat the CEE. However, we do expect that in the GEE the system can get in and out of the CEE, and so the qualitative behaviour might hold, at least for the case with jets (Soker 2017).…”
Section: Numerical Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A key question about SE SNe is the mechanisms that drive the removal of the envelopes of their progenitor stars. In particular, the debate centers around the relative roles, if any, of stellar winds (e.g., Woosley et al 1993;Georgy et al 2012;Groh et al 2013b), stellar rotation (e.g., Georgy et al 2012;Groh et al 2013a,b;Zhao & Fuller 2020), binary interactions (e.g., Podsiadlowski et al 1992;Yoon et al 2010Yoon et al , 2017Soker 2017;Lohev et al 2019), and, nuclear burning instabilities (e.g., Arnett & Meakin 2011;Strotjohann et al 2015). There has been growing support for binary interactions as dominant due to several independent lines of evidence, including weaker stellar winds (Smith 2014) and higher binary fractions (Sana et al 2012;Moe & Di Stefano 2017) than previously estimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of the above post-AGB intermediate binaries (post-AGBIBs) in the traditional orbital separation gap raises the possibility that another process plays a signifi-⋆ E-mail: kashi@ariel.ac.il † E-mail: soker@physics.technion.ac.il cant role in the evolution of post-AGBIBs. One such process to explain post-AGBIBs is the grazing envelope evolution (GEE; Soker 2017). According to the GEE, the more compact secondary star grazes the envelope of the giant star and accretes mass from its outer envelope or from its wind acceleration zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%