2019
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grazing exclusion erodes the forbs functional group without altering offspring recruitment composition in a typical steppe

Abstract: The underlying mechanism of grazing exclusion on grassland community structure and dynamics may be determined by offspring recruitment. However, little is known about the role of plant functional groups in community recruitment. A chronosequence of grazing‐excluded grasslands was selected to analyze the aboveground community composition and offspring recruitment based on plant functional groups. Grazing exclusion significantly increased grasses biomass (111.7–480.7%), height (95.6–241.8%), and coverage (84.8–1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plant materials harvested from the quadrat were oven‐dried for 48 h at 65°C and then weighed as the AGB. To analyze the effect mechanism of grazing on community biomass stability, plants were classified into two groups, including the grasses and forbs functional groups (Liu et al, 2015; Zhao et al, 2020; Appendix S1: Table S1). The forbs functional group includes a few leguminous plants because of their small proportion of the community biomass (<1%; Appendix S1: Figure S2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plant materials harvested from the quadrat were oven‐dried for 48 h at 65°C and then weighed as the AGB. To analyze the effect mechanism of grazing on community biomass stability, plants were classified into two groups, including the grasses and forbs functional groups (Liu et al, 2015; Zhao et al, 2020; Appendix S1: Table S1). The forbs functional group includes a few leguminous plants because of their small proportion of the community biomass (<1%; Appendix S1: Figure S2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, scholars have successfully implemented many restoration measures to alleviate degradation and increase vegetation cover in degraded grasslands [ 33 , 34 ]. At present, fencing is the most effective and economical measure to restore degraded grassland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in China, more than 90% of the grassland have been degraded as a result of climate change, land use change, and unsustainable human management practices (Z. Zhang, Li, et al, 2019; Zhou et al, 2019). Degraded grassland restoration and vegetation reconstruction have been paid more consideration in the past several decades (Martin & Wilsey, 2006; Tölgyesi et al, 2019; N. N. Zhang, Sun, et al, 2019; F. Zhang et al, 2020; Zhou et al, 2019), and numerous recovery practices have also been successfully implemented to alleviate degradation and to increase the vegetation cover in degraded grasslands (e.g., K. Liu et al, 2020; Martin & Wilsey, 2006; Pykala, 2003; D. L. Wang & Guo, 2019; H. X. Zhang, Xiang, et al, 2019; L. P. Zhao et al, 2020). However, with widespread and accelerating degradation of grasslands, more efficient ecological measures are needed for the degraded grassland restoration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%