2000
DOI: 10.2527/2000.7882192x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grazing methods and stocking rates for direct-seeded alfalfa pastures: I. Plant productivity and animal performance.

Abstract: A 4-yr study was conducted to determine the effects of two grazing methods (GM) at two stocking rates (SR) on alfalfa pasture plant productivity and animal performance and to ascertain the effect of grazing systems on subsequent performance of steers fed a high-concentrate diet. Eight pasture plots (.76 ha) were seeded in 1988 with alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. var. WL225) and divided into two blocks of four pastures each. Grazing methods consisted of a traditional four-paddock or an intensive 13-paddock system.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
12
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Weight gains of LUC 1 Feedlot young bulls that had been grazing increased when they were concentrate-fed in period 2, as Schlegel et al (2000) reported in steers, and were even higher than those of Feedlot animals. This increased performance was a result both of a greater energy intake and a 14% higher efficiency in this phase, which agrees with other studies comparing restricted-realimented v. continuously grown animals (Ellenberger et al, 1989;Hornick et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Weight gains of LUC 1 Feedlot young bulls that had been grazing increased when they were concentrate-fed in period 2, as Schlegel et al (2000) reported in steers, and were even higher than those of Feedlot animals. This increased performance was a result both of a greater energy intake and a 14% higher efficiency in this phase, which agrees with other studies comparing restricted-realimented v. continuously grown animals (Ellenberger et al, 1989;Hornick et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…In this study, LUC young bulls had a remarkable performance compared with the data of other works conducted with steers that grazed on lucerne with (Perry et al, 1971) or without grain supplementation (Schlegel et al, 2000;Lauriault et al, 2005). This may partly be explained by the different diets, breeds and sexual status of animals in the current and aforementioned studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…The effect of the stocking rate is normally inversely related to the average daily gain if there is no increase in the grass availability obtained, for example, by nitrogen fertilisation [46]. In the present study, however, the one third reduction in nitrogen fertiliser did not affect the individual performance, with grass height not being reduced by the reduction in nitrogen fertiliser.…”
Section: Performances Of Grazed Bullscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Then the averaged values of three IC replicates were regarded as the value of IC, and the same as the OC treatment. The summer pasture type, area, animal unit and animal load of pastures of the three farms are listed in Table 1 (Schlegel et al, 2000;Sun et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%