2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2011.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grazing tolerance and mycorrhizal colonization: Effects of resource manipulation and plant size in biennial Gentianella campestris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overcompensation is considered as adaptation to a predictable risk of damage (Crawley, 1987). It is known that the strength of the compensatory growth depends on nutrient availability and competition (Huhta et al, 2000;Piippo et al, 2011), but the phenomenon can still not finally be explained .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overcompensation is considered as adaptation to a predictable risk of damage (Crawley, 1987). It is known that the strength of the compensatory growth depends on nutrient availability and competition (Huhta et al, 2000;Piippo et al, 2011), but the phenomenon can still not finally be explained .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive mutualisms and higher rate of AMF colonization in nutrient limited grasslands is expected due to greater host nutrient demands for regrowth and to compensate for tissue loss caused by grazing (Guo et al, 2016;Faghihinia et al, 2020). Meanwhile, decreases AMF colonization was reported at very low nutrient availability due to apparent competition with the host plant for the limited resources (Piippo et al, 2011).…”
Section: Soil Nutrient Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%