2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Great activity enhancement of Co3O4/γ-Al2O3 catalyst for propane combustion by structural modulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, 3.75% Ru was focused on in the following investigation, unless otherwise specified. It should be pointed out that the contents of Ru loading were insensitive for the Ru/Co 3 O 4 catalyst; after increasing Ru loading, the activity increased slightly, which was probably associated with the fact that the pristine Co 3 O 4 was intrinsically highly active for propane catalytic combustion …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, 3.75% Ru was focused on in the following investigation, unless otherwise specified. It should be pointed out that the contents of Ru loading were insensitive for the Ru/Co 3 O 4 catalyst; after increasing Ru loading, the activity increased slightly, which was probably associated with the fact that the pristine Co 3 O 4 was intrinsically highly active for propane catalytic combustion …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, Ru/CeO 2 showed high activity for catalytic combustion of propane, 15 while Co 3 O 4 itself was highly active. 16 For comparison, the irreducible/amphoteric Al 2 O 3 -and inert SiO 2 -supported RuO x catalysts were also referenced. The catalytic activity and thermal stability of these supported RuO x catalysts were compared and investigated in detail.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were tightly controlled due to their toxicity and involvement in the formation of photochemical smog, and catalytic combustion was recognized the most e cient technique to eliminate VOCs emission (He et as methane, ethane and propane were considered to be extremely di cult to be oxidized due to their high stability of molecular structures, which were produced from automotive exhaust or industrial processes, such as natural gas vehicle (NGV), lique ed petroleum gas (LPG) vehicles and stationary power source complexation method with different small molecular carboxylic acids presented a high activity (the conversion of propane reached 90% at 250°C) and stability (at least 40 h) (Liu et al 2009). Cai also con rmed that Co 3 O 4 /γ-Al 2 O 3 was a high-active for propane combustion and developed a facile reduction-passivation approach to produce more abundant active cobalt oxides (Cai et al 2020). Hu reported the complete oxidation of propane on Ru/CeO 2 could be achieved below 200°C, due to the rich oxygen storage capacity of CeO 2 host, which can provide a large amount of active oxygen to RuO x for propane oxidation (Hu et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For the catalytic combustion of methane, Pd-based materials are considered as the most active catalysts, while Pt-based catalysts are preferred for the combustion of higher alkanes. [2][3][4][5][6] During the past years, noble metal-based materials (such as Pt, Pd, Rh, Au) [2,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and non-noble metal oxides (such as Co, Mn, Ni) [16][17][18][19][20] have been synthesized and applied as catalyst to the propane combustion reaction. Ruthenium is known to be one of the most active elements in the activation of CÀ H and CÀ C bonds, [21] thus making it a promising and less expensive alternative to Pt for the removal of higher hydrocarbons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%