2018
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aacc75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Great uncertainties in modeling grazing impact on carbon sequestration: a multi-model inter-comparison in temperate Eurasian Steppe

Abstract: The impact of grazing activity on terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration has been noticed and studied worldwide. Recent efforts have been made to incorporate the disturbance into process-based land models. However, the performance of grazing models has not been well investigated at large scales. In this study, we performed a spatially explicit model uncertainty assessment in the world's largest pasture ecosystem, the temperate Eurasian Steppe. Five grazing models were explicitly incorporated into a single terres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, much of current understanding of ecosystem sensitivity to precipitation variability is derived from responses of above‐ground net primary productivity (ANPP) to precipitation (Knapp et al, 2017b) and assessed independently of grazing effects (but see Irisarri et al, 2016), despite grazing being the predominant land‐use of grasslands (Asner et al, 2004). As such, understanding ecosystem responses to the interactive effects of co‐occurring factors is critical, and a reliable benchmark is needed for predicting ecosystem sensitivity robustly from ecosystem models (Dangal et al, 2017; Chen et al, 2018; Ma et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, much of current understanding of ecosystem sensitivity to precipitation variability is derived from responses of above‐ground net primary productivity (ANPP) to precipitation (Knapp et al, 2017b) and assessed independently of grazing effects (but see Irisarri et al, 2016), despite grazing being the predominant land‐use of grasslands (Asner et al, 2004). As such, understanding ecosystem responses to the interactive effects of co‐occurring factors is critical, and a reliable benchmark is needed for predicting ecosystem sensitivity robustly from ecosystem models (Dangal et al, 2017; Chen et al, 2018; Ma et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grazing process has recently been explicitly represented in global models (Chang et al, 2013; Luo et al, 2012; Pachzelt et al, 2013). However, large uncertainties still exist in modeling grazing activity (Chen et al, 2018; Fetzel et al, 2017; Zhou et al, 2017). A standard data set seems to be necessary to diagnose and benchmark the models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, several models have been incorporated into Global Vegetation Models and plan to be consider in future intermodel comparison projects (Erb et al, 2017; Pongratz et al, 2017). With the increasing model developments and applications, however, great uncertainties were found in both approaches at large scales (Chen et al, 2018; Fetzel et al, 2017). Therefore, a spatial‐explicit diagnostic tool or data set is urgently needed for model evaluation, benchmarking, and future improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the variety of livestock systems in operation globally complicates the discussion surrounding the effects of climate change (Lopez-i-Gelats 2014;Rivera-Ferre et al 2016). Inter-model uncertainty (e.g., what Chen et al (2018) demonstrated regarding carbon sequestration from grazing activity) also remains a problem.…”
Section: Pasture and Livestockmentioning
confidence: 99%