2016
DOI: 10.1108/jchmsd-09-2015-0030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Great Zimbabwe World Heritage Site and sustainable development

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the extent to which Great Zimbabwe World Heritage Site has contributed to the sustainable development of the local people who live in its vicinity. What is critically important to underscore is the value of the site to society. Design/methodology/approach The relevant data were collected through questionnaires, personal interviews and site visits. Findings The paper reveals that cultural heritage has affected sustainable development of local communities living… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fear of exploring (or perhaps exploiting) religion and heritage for the sake of material and commercial gains is present in such instances. Macheka (2016) also points to the issues which arise when different groups claim ownership of a heritage site which may also have religious significance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fear of exploring (or perhaps exploiting) religion and heritage for the sake of material and commercial gains is present in such instances. Macheka (2016) also points to the issues which arise when different groups claim ownership of a heritage site which may also have religious significance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discourse is holistic, its attention encompassing consideration of interdisciplinary approaches and multiple issues as diverse as equity, peace and security, human rights, urban planning, as well as permutations of sites with varying associations of cultural and natural heritage (see for example, Blake, ; Chechi, ; Huibin, Marzuki, & Razak, ; Laina, ; Larsen & Logan, ; Roders & van Oers, , ; Zhang, Zhou, Wu, Skitmore, & Deng, ). Inherent to the calls for sustainable development are concerns over implementation of the WH system's standards within developing countries, with elements of the discourse directed to promotion of conservation and sustainable development strategies that enable greater engagement with local communities (see for example, Chechi, ; Gullino et al, ; Halim & Ishak, ; Han et al, ; Larcher et al, ; La Rosa et al, ; Liu, ; Lixinski, ; Macheka, ; Owosuyim, ; Roders & van Oers, ). Consideration of local communities incurs identification of the stakeholders involved in management of a WH site, demarcating WH sites as venues bridging actors spanning global, national, and local levels (see for example, Allen & Lennon, ; Conradin & Hammer, ; Gullino et al, ; Iatu, Ibanescu, Stoleriu, & Munteanu, ; Nicholas & Thapa, ; Shende, ).…”
Section: Literature Review and Framing Sri Ksetra's Sustainable Develmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complicating implementation efforts are that the accommodation of local communities in decision making makes each WH site a function of its unique local context, and thereby implies that the universal reach of the WH system depends upon a broad range of site‐specific management models requiring individual study. The result is a burgeoning scholarly literature working to delineate the various ways in which local contexts in developing countries challenge the implementation of WH Policy (see for example Chechi, ; Gullino, Beccaro, & Larcher, ; Halim & Ishak, ; Han, Yang, Liu, & Wall, ; La Rosa, Barbarossa, Privitera, & Martinico, ; Larcher, Novelli, Gullino, & Devecchi, ; Liu, ; Lixinski, ; Macheka, ; Owosuyim, ; Roders & van Oers, ). The present analysis builds upon such literature, using a case study of Sri Ksetra, a site within Pyu Ancient Cities that marks Myanmar's first WH site (UNESCO, ), to expand understanding of the ways in which the implementation of WH Policy struggles to achieve its intended goals in developing countries like Myanmar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cultural village is a concept of area-based development that engages with the cultural and creative industries and tactical urbanism (Iveson, 2013; Macheka, 2016; Talen, 2015). The village uses cultural industries, such as handicraft, arts and cultural performances as the source of economic, social and environmental improvement of a village (Howkin, 2001).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%