2014
DOI: 10.1111/bre.12040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greater India's northern margin prior to its collision with Asia

Abstract: Greater India's northern edge prior to collision with Asia is typically modelled as a rifted passive margin. We argue for a quite different geometry as a consequence of two tectonic episodes that happened sometime before the main impact. Whilst the western segment of India's northern boundary had formed in the Late Triassic as a rifted margin, the central and eastern portions developed between 132 and 110 Ma when the sub‐continent separated from Australia–Antarctica as the inner wall of a dextral ‘scything’ tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(138 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we note that the ages of the youngest marine strata underlying any unconformity or at the top of structurally truncated sections remain a maximum age estimates and the apparent different in maximum ages may in fact be due to a different level of erosion instead of the diachronous collision. We also note recent work that suggests the northern margin of Greater Indian was not necessarily relatively linear nor was it a simple continent-ocean boundary (Ali and Aitchison, 2014). The Bartonian to Priabonian Zongpubei Formation indicates that closure of the Tethys seaway in the Eastern Himalaya occurred after Priabonian, which is compatible with the inference of a younger collision age suggested by Aitchison et al (2007) in this region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, we note that the ages of the youngest marine strata underlying any unconformity or at the top of structurally truncated sections remain a maximum age estimates and the apparent different in maximum ages may in fact be due to a different level of erosion instead of the diachronous collision. We also note recent work that suggests the northern margin of Greater Indian was not necessarily relatively linear nor was it a simple continent-ocean boundary (Ali and Aitchison, 2014). The Bartonian to Priabonian Zongpubei Formation indicates that closure of the Tethys seaway in the Eastern Himalaya occurred after Priabonian, which is compatible with the inference of a younger collision age suggested by Aitchison et al (2007) in this region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This two‐stage continental collision includes the first collision between the TH and the LT at ~59 Ma (DeCelles et al, ; Hu et al, ) and a final collision between the TH and the “remaining Greater India” at no later than ~39 Ma based on the latest initial collision age constructed in Figure a (Huang, Lippert, Dekkers, et al, ; Ma et al, ; van Hinsbergen et al, ; Yang, Ma, Bian, et al, ). Notably, considering potential challenges to different collision models described in Hu et al (), as well as debates on the shapes of the leading edges of the collisional units, especially the TH, more late Cretaceous and Paleocene paleomagnetic investigations from the TH and the LT are needed to further constrain the collision history and paleogeography of Greater India (Ali & Aitchison, , ; Ingalls et al, ; Jagoutz et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ali and Aitchison, 2014) continents may have generated transtension in the region between them during separation (Mascarene Rift of Bastia et al, 2010;Reeves, 2013). Accelerated sea-floor spreading between the Greater Indian and Antarctic continents occurred during the early Cretaceous Period at the expense of rifting in the Somali proto-ocean ( Fig.…”
Section: Plate Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%