1999
DOI: 10.1093/ije/28.3.428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Greater sensitivity to ionizing radiation at older age: follow-up of workers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory through 1990

Abstract: Findings suggest that sensitivity to the carcinogenic effects of ionizing radiation may increase with older ages at exposure. More attention should be given to the role of age at exposure in studies of the health effects of low-level exposure to ionizing radiation, and to efforts to limit exposure to ionizing radiation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are suggestions in these data that the solid cancer ERR increases with increasing age at first exposure or attained age (age at death) and that the leukemia ERR increases with increasing age at first exposure. These patterns appear to contradict what one would expect on the basis of the atomic bomb survivors (20,24) and mechanistic considerations (25)(26)(27)(28), but some analyses of U.S. nuclear workers have suggested similar general patterns (29,30). To try to better understand these unexpected temporal patterns, we performed some more detailed descriptive analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…There are suggestions in these data that the solid cancer ERR increases with increasing age at first exposure or attained age (age at death) and that the leukemia ERR increases with increasing age at first exposure. These patterns appear to contradict what one would expect on the basis of the atomic bomb survivors (20,24) and mechanistic considerations (25)(26)(27)(28), but some analyses of U.S. nuclear workers have suggested similar general patterns (29,30). To try to better understand these unexpected temporal patterns, we performed some more detailed descriptive analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…An exception to the low overall mortality rates among ORNL workers as compared to the general population, however, is the observed excess mortality due to leukemia and illdefined causes (7,8 (8). Subsequent analyses of that subcohort reported that associations between radiation dose and cancer mortality were primarily due to radiation doses accrued at older ages (10,11,24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of this workforce have reported excess leukemia mortality as compared to the general population (7,8) and positive associations between cumulative external ionizing radiation dose and cancer mortality among white males at the ORNL who had not been employed at other DOE facilities (8,9). Subsequent analyses found that these dose-response associations were primarily due to the association between cancer mortality and radiation doses received at older ages (10,11). In contrast to previous studies, which focused on radiation-mortality associations among white males at the ORNL who had not been employed at other DOE facilities (7)(8)(9), we describe analyses that include all ORNL workers for whom data were adequately complete.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…specified using information derived from prior epidemiologic research on a cohort of US nuclear workers [Richardson and Wing, 1999]. National and state mortality rate data provide an alternative to occupational cohort data as a source of information to use for this purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%