Advances in Water Purification Techniques 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-814790-0.00014-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green and Sustainable Pathways for Wastewater Purification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural coagulants have shown a strong potential over conventional, synthetic, and inorganic coagulants, and have become the primary focus of water operators in sustainable water treatment facilities [ 26 ]. Additionally, the positive attributes of these coagulants (green chemicals) are their limited side effects on the environment, and their isolation from natural and renewable resources provides additional benefits in reducing the costs associated with sludge disposal [ 27 , 28 ]. Traditional methods of coagulation or flocculation make use of synthetic or chemical coagulants such as aluminum sulfate (alum) and iron salts, but they pose serious health hazards to humans, such as neurodegenerative and gastrointestinal disorders [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural coagulants have shown a strong potential over conventional, synthetic, and inorganic coagulants, and have become the primary focus of water operators in sustainable water treatment facilities [ 26 ]. Additionally, the positive attributes of these coagulants (green chemicals) are their limited side effects on the environment, and their isolation from natural and renewable resources provides additional benefits in reducing the costs associated with sludge disposal [ 27 , 28 ]. Traditional methods of coagulation or flocculation make use of synthetic or chemical coagulants such as aluminum sulfate (alum) and iron salts, but they pose serious health hazards to humans, such as neurodegenerative and gastrointestinal disorders [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 120 min, Sim2 had the best result of Cu 2+ removal (71%), representing a notable mean reduction of copper from 0.0176 g/l (~9 times larger than the permissible limit in wastewater of 0.002 g/l) to 0.0051 g/l that is only~2.6 times larger than the permitted level (0.002 g/l) by the WHO [29]. This was followed by Seq1 (66%), whilst Sim1 (42%) and Seq2 Further, inferentially, our statistical model indicated that the treatment combination, the sampling time, and their interactions highly significantly affected Cu 2+ removal (X 2 (4,51) = 99.43, P < 0.0001), (X 2 (4,51) = 196.53, P < 0.0001), and (X 2 (20,51) = 85.48, P < 0.0001), respectively;…”
Section: Sims Vs Seqsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…At 120 min, Sim2 had the best result of Cu 2+ removal (71%), representing a notable mean reduction of copper from 0.0176 g/l (~9 times larger than the permissible limit in wastewater of 0.002 g/l) to 0.0051 g/l that is only~2.6 times larger than the permitted level (0.002 g/l) by the WHO [29]. This was followed by Seq1 (66%), whilst Sim1 (42%) and Seq2 (43%) were almost identical.…”
Section: Sims Vs Seqsmentioning
confidence: 96%