2017
DOI: 10.1504/ijgsb.2017.084701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green Bond and shareholders' wealth: a multi-country event study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The day after the event should be more important for the market. However, our results are consistent with other studies (Roslen et al, 2017;Flammer, 2018), who also found significant returns in two-day estimation window (-1; 0). We analyzed the CARs day-by-day (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The day after the event should be more important for the market. However, our results are consistent with other studies (Roslen et al, 2017;Flammer, 2018), who also found significant returns in two-day estimation window (-1; 0). We analyzed the CARs day-by-day (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The same line of reasoning can be applied to this paper's specific topic -the market's reaction to the issuance of sustainability bonds. Many studies show that investors have a positive response to news about the issuance of green bonds (Wang et al, 2020;Tang & Zhang, 2020;Roslen et al, 2017;Baulkaran, 2019). However, Lebelle et al (2020) document a negative market reaction when announcing the issuance of green bonds, especially for first-time transactions and for those performed in developed markets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of issuers, these can include emerging and developing countries or oil-dependent economies, provinces or states as well as municipalities that are based in high-risk regions (like flood zones or coastal regions) and have carbon-intensive business models that are resource-based like those of fossil fuel companies. Such social actors might start looking to issue green bonds or even transition-linked bonds [37] in order to cope with future climate risks [6,9,[38][39][40]. In terms of investors that face the most mimetic pressure, it can include those that have an asset-liability mismatch, such as those seen in pension funds having long-term fiduciary duties, as well as those that have high risk of stranded assets, especially due to exposure to carbon-intensive portfolios [41].…”
Section: Types Of Institutional Isomorphismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green Bond Literature: [6,15,16,27,36,38,40,41] In the green bond market, imitation can mean undertaking innovative activities or initiatives by primary social actors (who are most likely newcomers in this market) to reduce future uncertainties. However, as mentioned by Gupta et al [22] and presented in Figure 1 a few points need to be kept in mind when applying ACW-certain dimensions and criteria can be reinforcing as well as create tensions (e.g., between strong leadership and high variety), some criteria can make others less relevant (e.g., sufficient entrepreneurial may not require visionary leadership), dimensions and criteria are not independent of each other (e.g., resources and fair governance can have broad impacts) or of their contexts (e.g., what is applicable for green bonds in one country context, might not work in another country due to varying institutional dynamics) and lastly, even if financial markets showcase adaptive capacity, it does not mean that it will go into a greener direction (p. 465).…”
Section: Mimetic Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%