Green Bonds for the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy

Lichtenberger, Andreas; Braga, João Paulo; Semmler, Willi

doi:10.3390/econometrics10010011

Cited by 28 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Por otro lado, las finanzas sostenibles pueden generar valor combinado, es decir, generan rendimientos financieros y permiten mejorar las condiciones sociales y ambientales (Lichtenberger et al, 2022), (Agliardi & Agliardi, 2019), (Chiesa & Barua, 2019), así las cosas, es vista como una forma de lograr rentabilidad ambiental desde un ámbito financier (Adekoya et al, 2021).…”

Section: Resultados Finanzas Sostenibles: Una Revisión Conceptualunclassified

A Política Para O Desenvolvimento Das Redes Elétricas Inteligentes No Brasil: Um Estudo a Partir De Instituiçõeschave

Mori

2023

Economia Global: Mercados, Políticas E Estratégias

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Editora Direitos para esta edição cedidos à Atena Editora pelos autores. Open access publication by Atena Editora Todo o conteúdo deste livro está licenciado sob uma Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons. Atribuição-Não-Comercial-NãoDerivativos 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). O conteúdo dos artigos e seus dados em sua forma, correção e confiabilidade são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores, inclusive não representam necessariamente a posição oficial da Atena Editora. Permitido o download da obra e o compartilhamento desde que sejam atribuídos créditos aos autores, mas sem a possibilidade de alterála de nenhuma forma ou utilizá-la para fins comerciais.Todos os manuscritos foram previamente submetidos à avaliação cega pelos pares, membros do Conselho Editorial desta Editora, tendo sido aprovados para a publicação com base em critérios de neutralidade e imparcialidade acadêmica.A Atena Editora é comprometida em garantir a integridade editorial em todas as etapas do processo de publicação, evitando plágio, dados ou resultados fraudulentos e impedindo que interesses financeiros comprometam os padrões éticos da publicação. Situações suspeitas de má conduta científica serão investigadas sob o mais alto padrão de rigor acadêmico e ético.

show abstract

Section: Resultados Finanzas Sostenibles: Una Revisión Conceptualunclassified

A Política Para O Desenvolvimento Das Redes Elétricas Inteligentes No Brasil: Um Estudo a Partir De Instituiçõeschave

Mori

2023

Economia Global: Mercados, Políticas E Estratégias

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The federal government has long been providing, and is now accelerating, financial subsidies to market actors for mechanical carbon capture that data shows to be ineffective, resource-inefficient, and harmful in terms of co-impacts. Sound fiscal policies are required to remove distortionary incentives and also to finance effective decarbonization actions and financing tools (such as direct payments or green bonds for biological sequestration) that will meet the collective need for effective and efficient decarbonization [106,107]. Without a new policy framework, the results will be continued suboptimal outcomes for climate change mitigation at best and foreseeable hazards for people and places at worst.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Carbon dioxide removal–What’s worth doing? A biophysical and public need perspective

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) has become a focal point for legislators and policymakers who are pursuing strategies for climate change mitigation. This paper employs a policy framework of collective biophysical need to examine two broad categories of CDR methods being subsidized and advanced by the United States and other countries: mechanical capture and biological sequestration. Using published data on these methods, we perform a biophysical input-outcome analysis, focusing on the U.S., and compare methods on the basis of three criteria: effectiveness at net carbon removal, efficiency at a climate-relevant scale, and beneficial and adverse co-impacts. Our findings indicate that biological methods have a superior return on resource inputs in comparison to mechanical methods. Biological methods are both more effective and more resource efficient in achieving a climate-relevant scale of CO2 removal. Additionally, the co-impacts of biological methods are largely positive, while those of mechanical methods are negative. Biological methods are also far less expensive. Despite their disadvantages and a track record of failure to date, mechanical CDR methods continue to receive large subsidies from the US government while biological sequestration methods do not. To achieve more optimal CDR outcomes, policymakers should evaluate CDR methods’ effectiveness, efficiency, and biophysical co-impacts. We present tools for this purpose.

show abstract

“…Researchers incorporated green and fossil fuel bonds into a dynamic portfolio framework using cross-sectional data to measure variations (if they exist) in overall profitability in investor markets using risk-return techniques and time series analysis. As a result, experts have given a green signal to 'green bonds' in investor portfolios, helping to establish a low-carbon economy (Lichtenberger et al, 2022). Apart from taking baby steps like switching to LED energy-saving bulbs, adopting electric vehicles, steering clear of unnecessary prints, reducing pesticide consumption, utilizing modern agriculture technology, installing ground-level solar panels, and many more to breathe new life into our beloved ecosystem.…”

Section: Indian Perspectivementioning

confidence: 99%

Sovereign green bonds as an unconventional tool to address climate change

Yadav,

Manda,

Shivani

et al. 2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Creative efforts are necessary as global efforts seek to undertake projects focused on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives. Among various financial products that provide funding for projects, green bonds, particularly sovereign green bonds (SGB or SGrB) issued with sovereign guarantees by central governments, have gained prominence. Proceeds from SGBs are used to finance green projects such as non-conventional and renewable energy projects, alternative energy solutions, greenhouse gas emission reduction, climate change mitigation, or reduced use of carbon-based energy sources. SGB will receive increasing global attention as governments attempt to meet UN climate change goals. This research uses descriptive research methodology to examine the evolution, operational aspects, challenges, and investor expectations associated with SGrBs by taking India as a case. The study period is taken from 2016 to 2023. It used a conceptual approach to discuss the market's evolution. The findings highlight how SGBs provide an unconventional way to link green finance with ecological priorities by combining fiscal policy, investment and science-based solutions. The insights are intended to inform future SGB frameworks and strategies to target funded green growth towards pressing global sustainability issues.

show abstract

Green Bonds for the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy

Cited by 28 publications

References 45 publications

A Política Para O Desenvolvimento Das Redes Elétricas Inteligentes No Brasil: Um Estudo a Partir De Instituiçõeschave

A Política Para O Desenvolvimento Das Redes Elétricas Inteligentes No Brasil: Um Estudo a Partir De Instituiçõeschave

Carbon dioxide removal–What’s worth doing? A biophysical and public need perspective

Sovereign green bonds as an unconventional tool to address climate change

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About