2018
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/124/1/012004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green Building Premium Cost Analysis in Indonesia Using Work Breakdown Structure Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the additional investment cost reached 7.85% in Indonesia (Latief et al, 2017). This additional investment caused the unpopular application of green buildings in the country regardless of the value being lower and slightly higher than those in Jordan and Europe, respectively Basten, Latief, Berawi, Muliarto et al (2018). The high initial investment cost was also identified as a significant barrier to building adoption in the Malaysian construction industry.…”
Section: Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, the additional investment cost reached 7.85% in Indonesia (Latief et al, 2017). This additional investment caused the unpopular application of green buildings in the country regardless of the value being lower and slightly higher than those in Jordan and Europe, respectively Basten, Latief, Berawi, Muliarto et al (2018). The high initial investment cost was also identified as a significant barrier to building adoption in the Malaysian construction industry.…”
Section: Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Wimala et al (2016), the following main barriers were found in the country, (1) inadequate understanding of the green building concept, (2) the lack of information, (3) the high risk of green building investment due to the high initial cost, and (4) the reluctance of developers to implement green building regarding the unequal distribution of benefits between users and developers (split incentive). Besides this, one of the significant challenges in the country was also the high cost of implementation (Basten, Latief, Berawi, Muliarto et al, 2018). Based on these descriptions, the barrier factors hindered the adoption of green buildings in various countries, including Indonesia, with different challenges observed for each region.…”
Section: Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other researcher in Indonesia mentions that platinum-certified green buildings have the highest premium cost score, with building envelopes (23.89%), regional materials (15.92%), and legal logging materials (13.86%). Then, for gold-certified green buildings, the focus is on energy, intelligent lighting control system features (72.05%), and the building envelope (20.54%) [71]. Then, researchers by Hwang et al [14] identified that green building technology costs are high, with 10% of commercial building projects experiencing the highest premium cost, which is influenced by project type and size.…”
Section: Figure 9 Gb Cost Performance With Renewable Energy Implement...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building construction, on the other hand, has both positive and bad aspects, not only during construction but also throughout operation and maintenance. The operational phase of a building, as well as its life cycle, is a crucial element in reducing energy, water, and material resources [Basten V et al, 2018]. Buildings now account for up to 40% of total end-use energy globally, with developed countries consuming the majority of their energy in this sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%