“…Accounting for this diversity, Sjöstrom (2006) proposed two models for under-standing GC: a classification model of different green chemistry activities (research activities, management activities and policy activities), and a second model concerning green chemistry policy and knowledge areas (green chemistry principles, industrial biotechnology and the "green sector,'' i.e., agriculture and forestry). The debate about what exactly constitutes research in GC spans a continuum from GC as a new scientifi c discipline within the fi eld of chemistry (O'Brien et al, 2009), a science (O'Brien et al, 2009), a meta-discipline covering most of chemistry and chemical engineering (Sjöstrom, 2006), or a philosophical approach that underpins chemistry (Wilson and Schwarzman, 2009b;Llored, 2012;Bensaude-Vincent, 2013), to broader approaches including chemical risk policies (Iles, 2011) and all activities aiming at greening chemistry (Sjöstrom, 2006). The term itself seems to respond to a variety of research areas and objectives, which might explain its academic success, measured by the continuously increasing number of publications using it (Linthorst, 2010;Epicoco et al, 2012).…”