2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

14
392
0
27

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 788 publications
(433 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
14
392
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to thoroughly examine the role of bioeconomy in the context of sustainability, we exploited ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases by applying the query “bioeconomy AND sustainability.” The role of bioeconomy in sustainability (or sustainable development) was analyzed by Aquilani, Silvestri, Ioppolo, and Ruggieri (), Loiseau et al (), Ramcilovic‐Suominen and Pülzl (), Sadhukhana et al (), Lainez et al (), Koukios et al (), D'Amato et al (), Zilberman, Gordon, Hochman, and Wesseler (), Biber‐Freudenberger, Basukala, Bruckner, and Börner (), and Schütte (). Considering the development of bioeconomy and the two types of sustainability (weak and strong), Loiseau et al () argued that the conventional bioeconomy concept is rather related to weak sustainability as it focuses on using natural resource inputs in the production processes.…”
Section: Different Perspectives Of Bioeconomy Across Approaches Of Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In order to thoroughly examine the role of bioeconomy in the context of sustainability, we exploited ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases by applying the query “bioeconomy AND sustainability.” The role of bioeconomy in sustainability (or sustainable development) was analyzed by Aquilani, Silvestri, Ioppolo, and Ruggieri (), Loiseau et al (), Ramcilovic‐Suominen and Pülzl (), Sadhukhana et al (), Lainez et al (), Koukios et al (), D'Amato et al (), Zilberman, Gordon, Hochman, and Wesseler (), Biber‐Freudenberger, Basukala, Bruckner, and Börner (), and Schütte (). Considering the development of bioeconomy and the two types of sustainability (weak and strong), Loiseau et al () argued that the conventional bioeconomy concept is rather related to weak sustainability as it focuses on using natural resource inputs in the production processes.…”
Section: Different Perspectives Of Bioeconomy Across Approaches Of Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the development of bioeconomy and the two types of sustainability (weak and strong), Loiseau et al () argued that the conventional bioeconomy concept is rather related to weak sustainability as it focuses on using natural resource inputs in the production processes. D'Amato et al (), considering weak/strong sustainability visions, stated that the concept of bioeconomy remains limited in questioning economic growth. Ramcilovic‐Suominen and Pülzl () also noted that the bioeconomy framework and policy lean towards weak sustainability, whereas environmental and social concerns are less important when seeking for the development of the bioeconomy.…”
Section: Different Perspectives Of Bioeconomy Across Approaches Of Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations