2001
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.1091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green Fluorescent Protein variants fold differentially in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells

Abstract: Better-folding Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) mutants selected from bacterial screenings are commonly used in widely different cellular environments. However, it is unclear if the folding ef®ciency of GFPs is invariant in different cell types. In this work, we have analysed the folding properties of GFP variants in bacteria versus mammalian cells. Remarkably, S65T was found to fold at comparable levels with the wild type GFP in bacteria, but at 10-fold lower levels in mammalian cells. On the other hand, Bex1 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3A) is explained by the spontaneous upregulation of the bacterial chaperone program due to the presence of high concentrations of unfolded YFP in the bacterial cytoplasm (16). It is known that green fluorescent protein folding in vivo involves chaperones and that green fluorescent protein variants follow different folding trajectories (29). The increased dependence of cdYFP folding on chaperone activity was confirmed by the fact that the fluorescence yield was greatly increased by the induction of chaperones in liquid bacterial cultures after cold ethanol shock (42), which gave rise to an ϳ40-fold increase in fluorescence yield (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3A) is explained by the spontaneous upregulation of the bacterial chaperone program due to the presence of high concentrations of unfolded YFP in the bacterial cytoplasm (16). It is known that green fluorescent protein folding in vivo involves chaperones and that green fluorescent protein variants follow different folding trajectories (29). The increased dependence of cdYFP folding on chaperone activity was confirmed by the fact that the fluorescence yield was greatly increased by the induction of chaperones in liquid bacterial cultures after cold ethanol shock (42), which gave rise to an ϳ40-fold increase in fluorescence yield (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27). Most probably this observation implies that the Tat-EGFP fusion proteins unfold during membrane translocation, as commonly occurs in this process; once unfolded, an intrinsic property of GFP is to re-fold in an optically active form only at very low efficiency (57). This consideration also implies that the use of the EGFP reporter tag as the sole method by which to study the release of Tat from the cells (another process possibly requiring crossing of a cell membrane), as recently described (58), might possibly bring misleading conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the GFP is loosely folded or unfolded as a condition for secretion. Once secreted, GFP does not fold into a fluorescent conformation because of the absence of chaperone proteins (Feilmeier et al, 2000;Sacchetti et al, 2001). By contrast, GFP secreted via the ER-Golgi pathway is fluorescent in the medium because proper folding is maintained during secretion (Laukkanen et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%