2021
DOI: 10.1080/00139157.2021.1898894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Green Infrastructure: Lessons in Governance and Collaboration From Tucson

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Public education campaigns (Conway et al, 2021; Meng & Hsu, 2019), the incorporation of information about GSI into K‐12 and university curriculums (Dhakal & Chevalier, 2017), better signage on installations (Meenar et al, 2020), community forums (Barclay & Klotz, 2019), and better incorporation of university and Extension programming into outreach efforts (Jayakaran et al, 2020) were all cited as potential avenues for inciting greater public engagement with the topic of GSI. Other scholars propose a more ambitious approach: the active incorporation of residents into the design, development, and building of GSI to encourage a heightened sense of ownership of the installations (Everett et al, 2018; Gerlak et al, 2021). However, as noted above, the gaps in research on the social dimensions of GSI suggest the need for caution in assuming that such efforts will necessarily lead to the widespread acceptance of these installations.…”
Section: Reviewed Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Public education campaigns (Conway et al, 2021; Meng & Hsu, 2019), the incorporation of information about GSI into K‐12 and university curriculums (Dhakal & Chevalier, 2017), better signage on installations (Meenar et al, 2020), community forums (Barclay & Klotz, 2019), and better incorporation of university and Extension programming into outreach efforts (Jayakaran et al, 2020) were all cited as potential avenues for inciting greater public engagement with the topic of GSI. Other scholars propose a more ambitious approach: the active incorporation of residents into the design, development, and building of GSI to encourage a heightened sense of ownership of the installations (Everett et al, 2018; Gerlak et al, 2021). However, as noted above, the gaps in research on the social dimensions of GSI suggest the need for caution in assuming that such efforts will necessarily lead to the widespread acceptance of these installations.…”
Section: Reviewed Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches have been adopted with promising results in some contexts (Liberalesso et al, 2020; Nickel et al, 2014). For instance, in the desert city of Tucson, USA, a GSI Fund was established in 2019, funded by a surcharge on residents' monthly water bills (Gerlak et al, 2021). The money will be used to incorporate GSI projects into new development across the city, prioritizing installations in low‐income neighborhoods (Gerlak et al, 2021).…”
Section: Reviewed Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations