Green infrastructure: systematic literature review

Ying, Jun; Zhang, Xiaojing; Yi-qi, Zhang; Bilan, Svitlana

doi:10.1080/1331677x.2021.1893202

Cited by 87 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 73 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The authors decided to base their conclusions on the analysis performed with the use of the VOSviewer programme [5] which is quite common in similar studies [6][7][8][9]. The data necessary for its performance was taken from the Web of Science Core Collection [10].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Then, in order to make graphic analyses more readable, it was decided to exclude the expressions used in the Web of Science search engine, words describing the research area, as well as those referring to quality of life and quality in general. They included: areas (8), city (36), cities (39), of-life (9), place (9), quality (10), quality of life (42), qualityof-life (12), urban (18), urban quality (43) and urban quality of life (45). As a result, 44 words remained, and the links between them were checked by determining how often the pairs of words occurred in the data describing the publications in total.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Analysis of Research Hotspots in the Field of Urban Quality

Bieda

Telega

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Analysis of Research Hotspots in the Field of Urban Quality

Bieda

Telega

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These measures have countered the deterioration to well-being caused by the bandwagon effect, alleviated farmers’ “relative deprivation” caused by the inequitable distribution of income, reduced precautionary savings and increased current consumption, and exerted a positive effect on the farmers’ well-being [ 28 , 29 ]. Improvements in facilities such as health services, public education resources, road transport, recreational centers, and green infrastructure contribute to the residents’ subjective well-being [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Based on the above analysis, Hypothesis 3 was proposed.…”

Section: Theoretical Background and Research Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Rural Human Settlement Environment around Nature Reserves on Farmers’ Well-Being: A Field Survey Based on 1002 Farmer Households around Six Nature Reserves in China

Zhang

Kuang

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Numerous countries actively consider the human settlement environment and have implemented rural governance strategies to ameliorate the living conditions of rural dwellers. The construction of a rural human settlement environment is an important goal of China’s rural revitalization strategy and improving farmers’ well-being is a key element of China’s policies on agriculture, farmers, and villages. However, whether a rural human settlement environment enhances farmers’ well-being remains untested. By adopting the method of random stratified sampling, this study investigated 1002 farmers inside and outside six nature reserves in Liaoning, China. OLS and ordered probit regression models were used to assess the impact on the well-being and the satisfaction of farmers with their settlement environment around nature reserves from three aspects: the natural ecological environment, the hardware facility environment, and the daily governance environment. The results of this study proved that the construction of a human settlement environment can significantly boost the well-being of farmers. Moreover, the satisfaction towards the natural ecological environment, hardware facility environment, and daily governance environment exerts a substantial impact on the well-being at the significance level of 1%, with a positive sign, showing a stable enhancement role. Among them, the satisfaction with the hardware facility environment was the most essential for improving happiness, with a coefficient of 0.126. A heterogeneity analysis suggests that the positive effect of satisfaction with the human settlement environment on farmers’ well-being within nature reserves was more significant in the natural ecological environment, with a coefficient of 0.244; the hardware facility environment had the greatest positive effect on the well-being of farmers outside nature reserves, with a coefficient of 0.224; and the daily governance environment had a greater enhancing effect on the well-being of farmers both inside and outside nature reserves. Based on these results, it is recommended that governments encourage farmers around nature reserves to participate in wildlife accident insurance, strengthen ecological environmental protection, and enhance the hardware facility environment. Furthermore, local governments should disseminate knowledge of human settlement management to farmers and improve the efficiency of human settlement environment management at the grassroots level. Finally, governments should prioritize human settlement environment development and identify the farmers’ needs of human settlement environment to enhance their well-being.

show abstract

“…Also in this study, we analyze the GI literature from 1990 to 2020 more comprehensively and systematically than previous research, and the GI themes involve all the related sub-themes. Compared with Ying et al (2021), there is a richer and larger amount of literature evaluated, which is then analyzed according to research status, research trends, research hotspots, and research directions in the GI field more accurately and specifically [65]. Furthermore, this article also provides a detailed analysis and description of keywords (distribution, timeline, bursts), which more accurately reflect research themes and directions, the relationships between research themes and time spans covered, and the research topics across different time periods.…”

Section: Co-citation Analysis Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Web of Science-Based Green Infrastructure: A Bibliometric Analysis in CiteSpace

Shao

Kim

Li³

et al. 2021

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many cities worldwide are using re-greening strategies to help reverse urbanization patterns that aggravate environmental issues. Green infrastructure (GI) has become a significant and effective strategy to address environmental problems. To better understand GI, this study uses CiteSpace to analyze 5420 published papers in the field of GI on the Web of Science database from 1990–2020. This bibliometric analysis will help new scholars and researchers to better understand the current status and trends in GI research, as well as identify further research needed in the field. This study evaluated research on GI trends according to publication amounts, keywords, journals, disciplines, countries, institutions, and authors. Results show that, first, GI research has experienced rapid growth since 2014. Second, GI, ecosystem services, and city are the top three keywords related to GI research, with green roof as the keyword with the strongest linkage. Third, Sustainability, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, and Landscape and Urban Planning are the top three journals publishing GI research. Fourth, the top three disciplines researching GI are environmental science, engineering, and science and technology. Fifth, the USA is the top ranked country in terms of the number of published GI-related papers (1514 papers), followed by China (730 papers) and England (546 papers). Sixth, the US Environmental Protection Agency (84 papers) is the top institution in terms of publications, followed by the Chinese Academy of Science (83 papers) and the Swedish University of Agriculture (66 papers). Finally, D. Haase has the most published articles (29 papers), followed by S. Pauleit (28 papers) and P. Angelstam (26 papers). These findings indicate that GI has developed significantly in the last 30 years, with a high probability for increased growth in the future.

show abstract

Green infrastructure: systematic literature review

Cited by 87 publications

References 73 publications

The Analysis of Research Hotspots in the Field of Urban Quality

The Analysis of Research Hotspots in the Field of Urban Quality

Effect of Rural Human Settlement Environment around Nature Reserves on Farmers’ Well-Being: A Field Survey Based on 1002 Farmer Households around Six Nature Reserves in China

Web of Science-Based Green Infrastructure: A Bibliometric Analysis in CiteSpace

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About